From “Giant Leap” to a Maturing Specialty: A Commentary on the AGPA Practice Guidelines Second Edition
The second edition of the AGPA Practice Guidelines reflects a significant maturation of group psychotherapy as a clinical and scientific specialty. Building on the strengths of the first edition, the updated guidelines expand their theoretical, empirical, and ethical foundations, with particular attention to multicultural orientation, social justice, group leadership training, and evolving practice contexts. In this commentary, we compare the original and updated editions of the guidelines, highlighting key continuities, including their aspirational stance, theoretical pluralism, and integration of theory, practice wisdom, and empirical evidence. We also examine major areas of expansion, such as the growing emphasis on mechanisms of change, measurement-based care, and multilevel group processes. Drawing on clinical experience and cross-cultural perspectives, we explore how power, authority, and boundaries are enacted differently across cultural and institutional contexts and consider the implications of these differences for group leadership and ethical practice. Finally, we identify persistent gaps and emerging tensions, including resistance to guidelines, challenges in translating process research into training, and the continued dominance of Western epistemologies in group psychotherapy research. We conclude that the updated practice guidelines represent not only a consolidation of accumulated knowledge, but also an invitation to ongoing ethical, theoretical, and empirical dialogue within the field of group psychotherapy. (This is one of the commentaries for the edition on the new practice guidelines.).
Authors
- Dennis M. Kivlighan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-031X)
- Yong Jhao Chu
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
- Published
- 2026-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2026.2726749
- Primary Topic
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00