Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis

ABSTRACT Background The Age‐Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework (what Matters most, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) is an internationally recognized, evidence‐based approach to deliver consistent, person‐centered care to older adults in all healthcare settings. This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of the 4Ms Framework, from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members, at three early‐adopter healthcare services in Ireland. Participants and Setting Ten one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with doctors, nurses, and health and social care professionals working in three distinct healthcare settings in Ireland. Methods A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was adopted, following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Participants were purposively sampled to capture diverse perspectives across services, disciplines, and roles. The topic guide was informed by the Normalization Process Theory. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed manually using iterative thematic content analysis. Results The overarching theme identified, a supporting and enabling structure, was supported by three major themes: (1) Ability of the 4Ms Framework to facilitate an AFHS approach, (2) Securing sustainability of an AFHS, and (3) Impact of the 4Ms Framework as a driver of the implementation process. Based on these findings facilitators to implementation included early stakeholder engagement, strong leadership, and a scalable approach that fostered multidisciplinary collaboration and person‐centered care with minimal extra resources. Barriers to implementation included reliance on Americanized materials, risks of tokenistic adoption, variable integration across settings, and limited outcome evaluation. Conclusion The AFHS 4Ms Framework supports transformative, person‐centered care across diverse settings. This first Irish AFHS evaluation provides recommendations for wider implementation of the 4Ms Framework while contributing novel insights to the international implementation evidence base. This study emphasizes the need to adapt the 4Ms Framework to local systems, integrate robust evaluation, and build on the identified facilitators while addressing barriers to achieve sustainable, scalable adoption within healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70598
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis

Heather Hegarty, Tessa O’Gorman, Niamh Bambury, Hannah O'Brien et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Irish Healthcare Staff Perspectives on the Implementation of the Age‐Friendly Health Systems 4Ms Framework. A Qualitative Analysis

Heather Hegarty, Tessa O’Gorman, Niamh Bambury, Hannah O'Brien, Rebecca Marshall
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The Age‐Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework (what Matters most, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) is an internationally recognized, evidence‐based approach to deliver consistent, person‐centered care to older adults in all healthcare settings. This qualitative study evaluated the implementation of the 4Ms Framework, from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members, at three early‐adopter healthcare services in Ireland. Participants and Setting Ten one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with doctors, nurses, and health and social care professionals working in three distinct healthcare settings in Ireland. Methods A qualitative interpretive phenomenological design was adopted, following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Participants were purposively sampled to capture diverse perspectives across services, disciplines, and roles. The topic guide was informed by the Normalization Process Theory. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed manually using iterative thematic content analysis. Results The overarching theme identified, a supporting and enabling structure, was supported by three major themes: (1) Ability of the 4Ms Framework to facilitate an AFHS approach, (2) Securing sustainability of an AFHS, and (3) Impact of the 4Ms Framework as a driver of the implementation process. Based on these findings facilitators to implementation included early stakeholder engagement, strong leadership, and a scalable approach that fostered multidisciplinary collaboration and person‐centered care with minimal extra resources. Barriers to implementation included reliance on Americanized materials, risks of tokenistic adoption, variable integration across settings, and limited outcome evaluation. Conclusion The AFHS 4Ms Framework supports transformative, person‐centered care across diverse settings. This first Irish AFHS evaluation provides recommendations for wider implementation of the 4Ms Framework while contributing novel insights to the international implementation evidence base. This study emphasizes the need to adapt the 4Ms Framework to local systems, integrate robust evaluation, and build on the identified facilitators while addressing barriers to achieve sustainable, scalable adoption within healthcare settings.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
University College Cork (IE), Cork University Hospital (IE), Health Service Executive (IE), Family Carers Ireland (IE), Marymount University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.