THFR-E4 — Biological Realization of QCRS in THFR: Intertheoretical Convergence with the General Theory of Observation and the Observer

In THFR, QCRS describes an internal mechanism of local reduction and formalization of the information-quantum basis, through which, in the process of observation, an accessible distinction of Primary Objectivity acquires a determinate observable form and subsequently enters into the formation of stable Secondary Objectivity. For different morphogroups, the boundaries of accessibility and the character of such formalization may differ; however, QCRS itself has an exclusively biological realization in THFR. This leaves a fundamental question: why does the physical organization that carries out observational formalization belong specifically to the biological class? Within THFR, this result receives a theoretical explanation through the general architecture of admissibility and stability. If QCRS is part of the same information-quantum basis that it formalizes, its realization must also be subject to the general conditions governing the selection of admissible configurations. The intersection of homeostatic and harmonic constraints defines the domain of stably realizable organizations within which the biological class of physical QCRS realization is formed. Independently of this construction, the General Theory of Observation and the Observer derives a criterion of subject and observer organization without a prior choice of biological, artificial, or any other class of physical realization. Its subsequent logical, critical, and cross-disciplinary validation shows that the entire positively established class of subject realizations remains biological. The present work establishes that these two results form an intertheoretical convergence at the level of the class of physical realization. THFR arrives at the exclusively biological class of physical QCRS realization from its own ontology of formalization and stability, whereas the General Theory independently arrives at the biological class of the observer from a criterion into which biologicality was not built in advance. The exclusively biological class of physical QCRS realization thereby receives not only an internal theoretical explanation, but also intertheoretical support independent in its premises, method, and evidence base. It is precisely this convergence that substantially strengthens the evidential status of the biological realization of QCRS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22800827
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

THFR-E4 — Biological Realization of QCRS in THFR: Intertheoretical Convergence with the General Theory of Observation and the Observer

Vadym Semenov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

THFR-E4 — Biological Realization of QCRS in THFR: Intertheoretical Convergence with the General Theory of Observation and the Observer

Vadym Semenov
preprint en

Abstract

In THFR, QCRS describes an internal mechanism of local reduction and formalization of the information-quantum basis, through which, in the process of observation, an accessible distinction of Primary Objectivity acquires a determinate observable form and subsequently enters into the formation of stable Secondary Objectivity. For different morphogroups, the boundaries of accessibility and the character of such formalization may differ; however, QCRS itself has an exclusively biological realization in THFR. This leaves a fundamental question: why does the physical organization that carries out observational formalization belong specifically to the biological class? Within THFR, this result receives a theoretical explanation through the general architecture of admissibility and stability. If QCRS is part of the same information-quantum basis that it formalizes, its realization must also be subject to the general conditions governing the selection of admissible configurations. The intersection of homeostatic and harmonic constraints defines the domain of stably realizable organizations within which the biological class of physical QCRS realization is formed. Independently of this construction, the General Theory of Observation and the Observer derives a criterion of subject and observer organization without a prior choice of biological, artificial, or any other class of physical realization. Its subsequent logical, critical, and cross-disciplinary validation shows that the entire positively established class of subject realizations remains biological. The present work establishes that these two results form an intertheoretical convergence at the level of the class of physical realization. THFR arrives at the exclusively biological class of physical QCRS realization from its own ontology of formalization and stability, whereas the General Theory independently arrives at the biological class of the observer from a criterion into which biologicality was not built in advance. The exclusively biological class of physical QCRS realization thereby receives not only an internal theoretical explanation, but also intertheoretical support independent in its premises, method, and evidence base. It is precisely this convergence that substantially strengthens the evidential status of the biological realization of QCRS.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.