Expected late-stage reduction under extended screening in the first multicancer screening trial

Abstract The first multi-cancer screening trial did not meet its primary endpoint of reducing late-stage (stage III/IV) incidence after three screening rounds. We used a previously developed multi-cancer natural history model to assess whether continued annual screening could have produced larger benefit. The model was calibrated to match observed late-stage reductions by screening round and aggregate episode sensitivity for the trial’s 12 prespecified cancers, then used to project late-stage reductions over 10 annual screening rounds. Among the 15 best-calibrated models, early-stage preclinical detectable period ranged from 0.46 to 1.36 years, and per-cancer early-stage sensitivities from 30%-60% of previously reported sensitivities for clinically diagnosed cancers. The calibrated models reproduced the excess late-stage incidence in round 1 and increasing reductions thereafter. With continued screening, late-stage reductions by screening round plateaued at 13%-17% (range across 15 models), while cumulative late-stage reduction reached 9%-13% by round 10.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-26-0942
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Expected late-stage reduction under extended screening in the first multicancer screening trial

Jane Lange, Roman Gulati, Kemal Çag̃lar Gög̃ebakan, Ruth Etzioni
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Expected late-stage reduction under extended screening in the first multicancer screening trial

Jane Lange, Roman Gulati, Kemal Çag̃lar Gög̃ebakan, Ruth Etzioni
article en

Abstract

Abstract The first multi-cancer screening trial did not meet its primary endpoint of reducing late-stage (stage III/IV) incidence after three screening rounds. We used a previously developed multi-cancer natural history model to assess whether continued annual screening could have produced larger benefit. The model was calibrated to match observed late-stage reductions by screening round and aggregate episode sensitivity for the trial’s 12 prespecified cancers, then used to project late-stage reductions over 10 annual screening rounds. Among the 15 best-calibrated models, early-stage preclinical detectable period ranged from 0.46 to 1.36 years, and per-cancer early-stage sensitivities from 30%-60% of previously reported sensitivities for clinically diagnosed cancers. The calibrated models reproduced the excess late-stage incidence in round 1 and increasing reductions thereafter. With continued screening, late-stage reductions by screening round plateaued at 13%-17% (range across 15 models), while cumulative late-stage reduction reached 9%-13% by round 10.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Expected late-stage reduction under extended screening in the first multicancer screening trial — Jane Lange, Roman Gulati, et al. · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS