Impact of Dyadic Age Discrepancy on Non-Delivery e-Bike Rider Injury Severity in Collisions with Food Delivery Riders

The paper presents a Bayesian Hierarchical Generalized Ordered Probit model quantifying how the dyadic age difference between delivery riders (DR) and Non-Delivery e-bike Riders (NDR) determines traffic collision injury severity. Analysis of 741 adjudicated civil verdicts from China’s OpenLaw platform demonstrated a strict negative association between this relational age gap and physical trauma outcomes. The dyadic age difference yielded a posterior coefficient of −0.13. Shifting the DR from the 5th to the 95th relative age percentile increased the NDR “Not disabled” probability by 22.25 percentage points. This identical interval concurrently decreased severe Grade 8+ injury probabilities by 10.29 percentage points. Conversely, NDR absolute age positively escalated injury severity across the clinical spectrum. These statistical estimates suggest that older DR are associated with reduced physiological vulnerability in aging commuter populations. Current automated dispatch algorithms optimize exclusively for delivery speed and completely atomize the gig workforce. Platform architects can reconfigure these digital systems to proactively pair experienced older riders with younger peers during overlapping dispatch windows. This algorithmic peer-mentoring strategy bypasses ineffective asynchronous training modules. Re-engineering dispatch logic directly operationalizes the relational age gradient to mitigate the systemic trauma burden threatening modern mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16189183
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of Dyadic Age Discrepancy on Non-Delivery e-Bike Rider Injury Severity in Collisions with Food Delivery Riders

Hua Bai, Xingchen Yan, Xiaofei Ye, Jun Chen et al.
Applied Sciences
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Impact of Dyadic Age Discrepancy on Non-Delivery e-Bike Rider Injury Severity in Collisions with Food Delivery Riders

Hua Bai, Xingchen Yan, Xiaofei Ye, Jun Chen, Xiaoqiang Zhang, Tao Wang, Huitao Lv
article en

Abstract

The paper presents a Bayesian Hierarchical Generalized Ordered Probit model quantifying how the dyadic age difference between delivery riders (DR) and Non-Delivery e-bike Riders (NDR) determines traffic collision injury severity. Analysis of 741 adjudicated civil verdicts from China’s OpenLaw platform demonstrated a strict negative association between this relational age gap and physical trauma outcomes. The dyadic age difference yielded a posterior coefficient of −0.13. Shifting the DR from the 5th to the 95th relative age percentile increased the NDR “Not disabled” probability by 22.25 percentage points. This identical interval concurrently decreased severe Grade 8+ injury probabilities by 10.29 percentage points. Conversely, NDR absolute age positively escalated injury severity across the clinical spectrum. These statistical estimates suggest that older DR are associated with reduced physiological vulnerability in aging commuter populations. Current automated dispatch algorithms optimize exclusively for delivery speed and completely atomize the gig workforce. Platform architects can reconfigure these digital systems to proactively pair experienced older riders with younger peers during overlapping dispatch windows. This algorithmic peer-mentoring strategy bypasses ineffective asynchronous training modules. Re-engineering dispatch logic directly operationalizes the relational age gradient to mitigate the systemic trauma burden threatening modern mobility.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(18)
Ningbo University (CN), Nanjing Forestry University (CN), China Design Group (China) (CN), Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.