Secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system: risk classification, healthcare capacity, and inequality

In many health systems, secondary prevention operates as a routine infrastructure of adult healthcare. Guideline thresholds help determine who is classified as at risk and who enters ongoing monitoring and treatment, yet they produce system-wide consequences that are rarely considered together. Here we argue that viewing secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system helps connect debates on threshold shifts, overdiagnosis, healthcare demand and inequalities in preventive care. Using hypertension and statin eligibility as examples, we show how threshold shifts act as system-level events whose consequences extend beyond individual eligibility decisions. Characteristic features of complex adaptive systems, including feedback, adaptation, and nonlinearity, can interact with unequal access to shape preventive trajectories, generating pressure on finite healthcare capacity and inequalities in care and health outcomes. This systems perspective can help anticipate the unintended consequences of threshold changes and inform equitable approaches to preventive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22801098
Primary Topic
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system: risk classification, healthcare capacity, and inequality

Jeroen F. Uleman, Cornelia Wagner, Tjeerd Rudmer de Vries, Tibor V. Varga
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
preprint

Secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system: risk classification, healthcare capacity, and inequality

Jeroen F. Uleman, Cornelia Wagner, Tjeerd Rudmer de Vries, Tibor V. Varga
preprint en

Abstract

In many health systems, secondary prevention operates as a routine infrastructure of adult healthcare. Guideline thresholds help determine who is classified as at risk and who enters ongoing monitoring and treatment, yet they produce system-wide consequences that are rarely considered together. Here we argue that viewing secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system helps connect debates on threshold shifts, overdiagnosis, healthcare demand and inequalities in preventive care. Using hypertension and statin eligibility as examples, we show how threshold shifts act as system-level events whose consequences extend beyond individual eligibility decisions. Characteristic features of complex adaptive systems, including feedback, adaptation, and nonlinearity, can interact with unequal access to shape preventive trajectories, generating pressure on finite healthcare capacity and inequalities in care and health outcomes. This systems perspective can help anticipate the unintended consequences of threshold changes and inform equitable approaches to preventive care.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Fribourg (CH)
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Secondary prevention as a complex adaptive system: risk classification, healthcare capacity, and inequality — Jeroen F. Uleman, Cornelia Wagner, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS