Multi-Scale Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products and Their Impacts on Hydrological Simulation in a Humid Mountainous Basin

Accurate precipitation information is crucial for hydrological simulation and water resources management, especially in humid mountainous regions where complex terrain and spatially heterogeneous rainfall introduce considerable uncertainties. Satellite-based precipitation products provide important data sources for hydrological applications; however, their reliability and impacts on runoff simulations remain uncertain across different spatial and temporal scales. This study presents a multi-scale validation of four precipitation products, including GSMaP, PERSIANN, GPM IMERG, and CLDAS, and evaluates their effects on hydrological simulation in the Oujiang River Basin, a typical humid mountainous basin in southeastern China. Daily precipitation estimates from 2015 to 2020 were compared with gauge observations using statistical metrics and precipitation event indicators. The hydrological applicability of each product was further assessed by driving a semi-distributed Xin’anjiang model, with evaluations conducted at the basin outlet, seasonal periods, extreme rainfall events, and internal subbasins. Results showed that CLDAS achieved the best overall agreement with gauge observations, with lower systematic bias and higher capability in detecting precipitation variability. Satellite-only products exhibited larger uncertainties, particularly during extreme rainfall events and in areas with complex terrain. These precipitation uncertainties were further propagated into runoff simulations, leading to differences in hydrological performance among products. CLDAS-driven simulations showed the highest accuracy, achieving R2, NSE, and KGE values of 0.706, 0.681, and 0.815, respectively, which were comparable to simulations driven by gauge-based precipitation. Multi-scale analysis revealed that product performance varied among subbasins due to differences in topography, rainfall characteristics, and human regulation. This study demonstrates the importance of multi-scale validation for quantifying uncertainties in satellite-based precipitation products and improving their application in hydrological modeling over mountainous regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18183190
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi-Scale Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products and Their Impacts on Hydrological Simulation in a Humid Mountainous Basin

Dingtao Shen, Helong Wang, Zhuang Niu, Shenjun Lu et al.
Remote Sensing
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Multi-Scale Validation of Satellite-Based Precipitation Products and Their Impacts on Hydrological Simulation in a Humid Mountainous Basin

Dingtao Shen, Helong Wang, Zhuang Niu, Shenjun Lu, Shizong Zheng
article en

Abstract

Accurate precipitation information is crucial for hydrological simulation and water resources management, especially in humid mountainous regions where complex terrain and spatially heterogeneous rainfall introduce considerable uncertainties. Satellite-based precipitation products provide important data sources for hydrological applications; however, their reliability and impacts on runoff simulations remain uncertain across different spatial and temporal scales. This study presents a multi-scale validation of four precipitation products, including GSMaP, PERSIANN, GPM IMERG, and CLDAS, and evaluates their effects on hydrological simulation in the Oujiang River Basin, a typical humid mountainous basin in southeastern China. Daily precipitation estimates from 2015 to 2020 were compared with gauge observations using statistical metrics and precipitation event indicators. The hydrological applicability of each product was further assessed by driving a semi-distributed Xin’anjiang model, with evaluations conducted at the basin outlet, seasonal periods, extreme rainfall events, and internal subbasins. Results showed that CLDAS achieved the best overall agreement with gauge observations, with lower systematic bias and higher capability in detecting precipitation variability. Satellite-only products exhibited larger uncertainties, particularly during extreme rainfall events and in areas with complex terrain. These precipitation uncertainties were further propagated into runoff simulations, leading to differences in hydrological performance among products. CLDAS-driven simulations showed the highest accuracy, achieving R2, NSE, and KGE values of 0.706, 0.681, and 0.815, respectively, which were comparable to simulations driven by gauge-based precipitation. Multi-scale analysis revealed that product performance varied among subbasins due to differences in topography, rainfall characteristics, and human regulation. This study demonstrates the importance of multi-scale validation for quantifying uncertainties in satellite-based precipitation products and improving their application in hydrological modeling over mountainous regions.

Remote SensingVol. 18(18)
Water and Power Development Authority (PK), Central China Normal University (CN), Zhejiang Lab (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.