Proportional limb strengths signal an adaptive shift in arboreality in early human evolution

How much arboreality characterized the Australopithecus locomotor repertoire and how this differed from early Homo are vigorously debated. Most previous studies rely on traits of uncertain functional significance or are constrained by sampling concerns. Bone shaft strength is plastic and reflects in vivo mechanical loading. Because interlimb bone strength proportions among living apes correlate with arboreality, they are ideal contributors to this debate. We present the most comprehensive analysis yet of relative limb shaft strengths in Australopithecus and early Homo by adding two individuals [StW 573, ∼3.67 million years ago (Ma); and D3901/D4167/D4507, ∼1.77 to 1.81 Ma]. We show that Australopithecus individuals of varying body sizes spanning at least 0.5 Ma exhibit African ape–like interlimb strength proportions, indicating frequent arboreal behavior, and that the Australopithecus lower limb exhibits human-like intralimb strength proportions. In contrast, early Homo individuals are human-like in both strength proportions, reflecting fundamentally different selective pressures favoring terrestrial bipedalism and an unambiguous departure from arboreality by ∼1.8 Ma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeh1752
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Proportional limb strengths signal an adaptive shift in arboreality in early human evolution

Amélie Beaudet, Robin H. Crompton, Kristian J. Carlson, David Lordkipanidze et al.
Science Advances
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Proportional limb strengths signal an adaptive shift in arboreality in early human evolution

Amélie Beaudet, Robin H. Crompton, Kristian J. Carlson, David Lordkipanidze, Timothy M. Ryan, Kathleen Kuman, Tea Jashashvili, Jason L. Heaton, Dominic Stratford, Adam D. Sylvester, M. Loring Burgess, Christopher B. Ruff, A. J. Heile, Lauren Sarringhaus, Ronald J. Clarke, Travis R. Pickering
article en

Abstract

How much arboreality characterized the Australopithecus locomotor repertoire and how this differed from early Homo are vigorously debated. Most previous studies rely on traits of uncertain functional significance or are constrained by sampling concerns. Bone shaft strength is plastic and reflects in vivo mechanical loading. Because interlimb bone strength proportions among living apes correlate with arboreality, they are ideal contributors to this debate. We present the most comprehensive analysis yet of relative limb shaft strengths in Australopithecus and early Homo by adding two individuals [StW 573, ∼3.67 million years ago (Ma); and D3901/D4167/D4507, ∼1.77 to 1.81 Ma]. We show that Australopithecus individuals of varying body sizes spanning at least 0.5 Ma exhibit African ape–like interlimb strength proportions, indicating frequent arboreal behavior, and that the Australopithecus lower limb exhibits human-like intralimb strength proportions. In contrast, early Homo individuals are human-like in both strength proportions, reflecting fundamentally different selective pressures favoring terrestrial bipedalism and an unambiguous departure from arboreality by ∼1.8 Ma.

Science AdvancesVol. 12(38)
Tbilisi State University (GE), University of Southern California (US), James Madison University (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Cambridge (GB), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Georgian National Museum (GE), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), National Museum (ZA), Institute of Paleoprimatology Human Paleontology Evolution and Paleoenvironments (FR), Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.