Predictors of work engagement among rural and remote nurses who provide hospice, palliative, and end of life care: Results from a national study

Background The availability of palliative health care professionals is considered a global concern, especially within rural/remote practice settings. Nurses across all domains of practice are expected to advocate for high-quality hospice, palliative, and end of life (H/P/EOL) care. However, within many rural/remote geographical areas, formal palliative care services are non-existent, leaving generalist nurses to take on this complex responsibility. Methods Examining results from a Pan-Canadian cross-sectional survey of rural and remote nurses (N = 3,822), this paper explores a subset (n = 295) of nurses who provided hospice, palliative and/or end of life care as part of their practice. Analyses examined job demands and job resources, predictors of work engagement, and a summary of open-ended responses. Results The rural and remote nurses who worked in hospice, palliative, and/or end of life care had significantly higher satisfaction with practice demands related to their safety, lower practice resources related to staffing and time, and higher levels of work engagement compared to nurses in other areas. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that seven variables accounted for 40% of the variance in their work engagement, including: perceived mental health, job satisfaction, interprofessional collaboration, affective organizational commitment, continuance organizational commitment, normative organizational commitment, and lower job demands related to working conditions. Open-ended data revealed that rural nurses felt privileged to provide H/P/EOL care, however, faced barriers related to blurred personal/professional boundaries when dealing with death/dying and lack of access to palliative resources. Conclusions This is the first Canadian national profile of rural and remote nurses who provide hospice, palliative and end of life care and highlights key areas related to their professional quality of life (e.g., work engagement, organizational commitment, job resources/demands). The results of this analysis may inform practice and policy development for health human resource planning and recruitment/retention in hospice, palliative and/or end of life care across rural and remote settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358592
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Predictors of work engagement among rural and remote nurses who provide hospice, palliative, and end of life care: Results from a national study

Martha MacLeod, Steinunn Jónatansdóttir, Kelly Penz, Julie Kosteniuk et al.
PLoS ONE
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Predictors of work engagement among rural and remote nurses who provide hospice, palliative, and end of life care: Results from a national study

Martha MacLeod, Steinunn Jónatansdóttir, Kelly Penz, Julie Kosteniuk, Norma J. Stewart, Erin Barker
article en

Abstract

Background The availability of palliative health care professionals is considered a global concern, especially within rural/remote practice settings. Nurses across all domains of practice are expected to advocate for high-quality hospice, palliative, and end of life (H/P/EOL) care. However, within many rural/remote geographical areas, formal palliative care services are non-existent, leaving generalist nurses to take on this complex responsibility. Methods Examining results from a Pan-Canadian cross-sectional survey of rural and remote nurses (N = 3,822), this paper explores a subset (n = 295) of nurses who provided hospice, palliative and/or end of life care as part of their practice. Analyses examined job demands and job resources, predictors of work engagement, and a summary of open-ended responses. Results The rural and remote nurses who worked in hospice, palliative, and/or end of life care had significantly higher satisfaction with practice demands related to their safety, lower practice resources related to staffing and time, and higher levels of work engagement compared to nurses in other areas. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that seven variables accounted for 40% of the variance in their work engagement, including: perceived mental health, job satisfaction, interprofessional collaboration, affective organizational commitment, continuance organizational commitment, normative organizational commitment, and lower job demands related to working conditions. Open-ended data revealed that rural nurses felt privileged to provide H/P/EOL care, however, faced barriers related to blurred personal/professional boundaries when dealing with death/dying and lack of access to palliative resources. Conclusions This is the first Canadian national profile of rural and remote nurses who provide hospice, palliative and end of life care and highlights key areas related to their professional quality of life (e.g., work engagement, organizational commitment, job resources/demands). The results of this analysis may inform practice and policy development for health human resource planning and recruitment/retention in hospice, palliative and/or end of life care across rural and remote settings.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
University of Northern British Columbia (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Canadian Rural Health Research Society (CA), University of Akureyri (IS)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.