Reducing the Computational Cost of QED Stability Analysis with SRE Graph Computations: Mechanism, Worked Examples, and Asymptotic Analysis

{"The":[0,74,159],"core":[1],"computational":[2,72],"task":[3],"of":[4,51,119,135,145,153],"QED":[5,120,190,200,209],"is":[6,21,76,83,179],"to":[7],"answer":[8],"\\"can":[9],"the":[10,32,42,48,52,86,132,146,156,165,170],"electron":[11],"orbit":[12],"remain":[13],"stable":[14],"under":[15],"perturbation\\",":[16],"and":[17,91,109,121],"its":[18,71,163],"standard":[19],"implementation":[20],"multi-order":[22,136],"Feynman-diagram":[23],"perturbative":[24,137],"summation,":[25],"whose":[26],"cost":[27],"grows":[28],"(roughly)":[29],"factorially":[30],"with":[31,65,70,186],"required":[33,147],"precision.":[34],"This":[35],"paper":[36,160],"proposes":[37],"an":[38],"orthogonal":[39],"path":[40],"within":[41],"SRE":[43,82,192,203,211],"framework:":[44],"encode":[45],"\\"stability\\"":[46,80],"in":[47,81],"spectral":[49,88,140],"response":[50],"60-node":[53],"Möbius":[54,196],"ladder":[55],"$M_{60}$,":[56],"readable":[57],"from":[58],"a":[59,115,143,182],"first-order":[60],"eigenvalue":[61],"solve,":[62],"**aligning":[63],"only":[64,168],"QED's":[66],"stability":[67],"conclusions,":[68],"not":[69,173],"process**.":[73],"argument":[75],"threefold.":[77],"(1)":[78],"*Mechanism*:":[79],"expressed":[84],"by":[85],"raw":[87],"gap":[89],"$\\\\lambda_2$":[90],"$\\\\mathbb{Z}_2$":[92,206],"double-cover":[93],"topological":[94,104],"immunity.":[95],"(2)":[96],"*Worked":[97],"examples*:":[98],"for":[99,174],"four":[100],"criteria":[101],"—":[102,112],"immunity,":[103],"(Z₂)":[105],"breaking,":[106],"deep-potential":[107],"disorder,":[108],"cross-class":[110],"ordering":[111],"we":[113,130],"give":[114],"side-by-side":[116],"computational-cost":[117],"comparison":[118],"SRE;":[122],"numerical":[123,176],"validation":[124],"passes":[125],"4/4.":[126],"(3)":[127],"*Asymptotic":[128],"analysis*:":[129],"compare":[131],"complexity":[133,154],"scaling":[134],"summation":[138],"versus":[139],"solving":[141],"as":[142,181],"function":[144],"precision,":[148],"quantifying":[149],"\\"a":[150],"one-tier":[151],"reduction":[152],"at":[155,169],"criterion":[157],"layer\\".":[158],"honestly":[161],"states":[162],"boundaries:":[164],"simplification":[166],"holds":[167],"decision":[171],"layer,":[172],"per-precision":[175],"prediction;":[177],"α":[178,216,218],"treated":[180],"direct":[183],"input":[184],"retreat":[185],"no":[187],"emergence":[188],"claim.":[189],"的核心计算任务是回答\\"电子轨道经扰动后能否保持稳定\\",其标准实现是多阶费曼图微扰求和,计算代价随所需精度指数增长。本文在":[191],"框架下提出一个正交路径:把\\"稳定性\\"编码为":[193],"60":[194],"节点":[195],"阶梯":[197],"$M_{60}$":[198],"的谱回应用一阶特征值求解即可判读,**只对齐":[199],"关于稳定性的结论输出,不对齐其计算过程**。本文给出该方法的三层论证:(1)":[201],"机理——\\"稳定性\\"在":[202],"中由谱间隙":[204],"$\\\\lambda_2$(原始谱)与":[205],"双覆盖拓扑免疫表达;(2)":[207],"算例——对免疫性、拓扑破缺、深势无序、跨类排序四类判据,逐一给出":[208],"与":[210],"的计算需求对比;数值验证":[212],"4/4":[213],"通过;(3)":[214],"渐近分析——对比多阶微扰求和与谱求解在所需精度下的复杂度缩放,给出\\"判据层复杂度下降一个档次\\"的量化依据。全文诚实地声明适用边界:该简化只在判定性层次有效,不延伸到逐精度数值预言;且":[215],"系作为直接输入,本文不做":[217],"的涌现宣称。":[219]}