Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths

Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths presents a standalone philosophical framework for reasoning, resolution, and action under ambiguity. The paper develops Superpositional Philosophy as a disciplined approach to preserving multiple relevant states, resisting premature binary collapse, distinguishing difference from contradiction, and carrying unresolved structure forward when the evidence does not justify forced resolution. It examines the framework in relation to many-valued logic, perspectivism, defeasible reasoning, and other existing traditions, while introducing formal distinctions, operational principles, objections, and representational consequences. The paper also includes a triadic residual formalization for preserving structured disagreement across interacting perspectives without presuming convergence. The work is intended as both a philosophical foundation and a bridge toward representational, computational, and systems-oriented applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22787252
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths

Sean Breeden
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths

Sean Breeden
article en

Abstract

Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths presents a standalone philosophical framework for reasoning, resolution, and action under ambiguity. The paper develops Superpositional Philosophy as a disciplined approach to preserving multiple relevant states, resisting premature binary collapse, distinguishing difference from contradiction, and carrying unresolved structure forward when the evidence does not justify forced resolution. It examines the framework in relation to many-valued logic, perspectivism, defeasible reasoning, and other existing traditions, while introducing formal distinctions, operational principles, objections, and representational consequences. The paper also includes a triadic residual formalization for preserving structured disagreement across interacting perspectives without presuming convergence. The work is intended as both a philosophical foundation and a bridge toward representational, computational, and systems-oriented applications.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Superpositional Philosophy: The Ambiguities of Binary and All Things Subtle To Find Unbiased Ethical Truths — Sean Breeden · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS