Thinking as Relational Process and Pattern in Semiotic Cultural Psychology

{"This":[0,91],"study":[1],"challenges":[2],"traditional":[3],"psychological":[4],"notions":[5],"of":[6,42,64,124,143,197],"thinking":[7,17,36],"as":[8,70,112,131,149,163,165],"a":[9,23,71,150],"static":[10],"cognitive":[11],"trait.":[12],"Instead,":[13],"we":[14,153],"construe":[15],"enduring":[16],"patterns":[18,110,129],"to":[19,51,118,137,171],"emerge":[20],"persistently":[21],"in":[22,76,120,139,175],"semiotic-relational":[24],"process":[25,74,94],"across":[26,193],"three":[27],"intertwined":[28],"cultural-psychological":[29],"lenses:":[30],"worldviews":[31],"(macro-level),":[32],"mindsets":[33],"(meso-level),":[34],"and":[35,61,87,102,192],"styles":[37],"(micro-level).":[38],"The":[39],"overarching":[40],"field":[41],"Semiotic":[43],"Cultural":[44],"Psychology":[45],"theory":[46],"(SCPT)":[47],"has":[48],"been":[49],"developed":[50],"focus":[52],"on":[53],"the":[54,59,77,81,84,88,97,104,194],"embodied":[55],"micro-mechanisms":[56],"that":[57],"bridge":[58],"intra-":[60],"interpsychological":[62],"levels":[63],"reality":[65],"through":[66,159],"semiotic":[67,72,93,122,141,168],"dynamics.":[68],"Thinking":[69],"relational":[73,109,128,177],"occurs":[75],"dynamic":[78,92],"sign-relations":[79],"between":[80],"person":[82],"observed,":[83],"observing":[85],"person,":[86],"\\"generalised":[89],"other\\".":[90],"happens":[95],"at":[96,103],"personal,":[98],"\\"I-Me\\"":[99],"meaning-making":[100],"level":[101],"cultural,":[105],"\\"We-Us\\"":[106],"level.":[107],"'Complex'":[108],"such":[111,130],"mutuality":[113],"&":[114,133],"integration":[115],"are":[116,135],"conceived":[117],"develop":[119,138],"support-amplifying":[121],"loops":[123,142],"enhancement,":[125],"while":[126],"'simpler'":[127],"reductionism":[132],"fragmentation":[134],"considered":[136],"control-dampening":[140],"constraint.":[144],"Using":[145],"Thai":[146,156],"food":[147],"systems":[148],"theoretical":[151],"case,":[152],"consider":[154],"ways":[155],"actors":[157],"move":[158],"shifting":[160],"sign":[161],"positions":[162],"well":[164],"their":[166],"likely":[167],"mediational":[169],"responses":[170],"'crisis'":[172],"situations.":[173],"Thinking,":[174],"our":[176],"sense,":[178],"is":[179],"not":[180],"something":[181,185],"individuals":[182],"possess":[183],"but":[184],"they":[186],"do":[187],"together":[188],"semiotically,":[189],"within":[190],"culture,":[191],"evolving":[195],"dynamics":[196],"cultural":[198],"life.":[199]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-026-10030-3
Primary Topic
Social Representations and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Thinking as Relational Process and Pattern in Semiotic Cultural Psychology

Glen Rutherford, Sudarat Tuntivivat, Edris Alam, George Onyeukwu
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
Social Representations and Identity
article

Thinking as Relational Process and Pattern in Semiotic Cultural Psychology

Glen Rutherford, Sudarat Tuntivivat, Edris Alam, George Onyeukwu
article en

Abstract

This study challenges traditional psychological notions of thinking as a static cognitive trait. Instead, we construe enduring thinking patterns to emerge persistently in a semiotic-relational process across three intertwined cultural-psychological lenses: worldviews (macro-level), mindsets (meso-level), and thinking styles (micro-level). The overarching field of Semiotic Cultural Psychology theory (SCPT) has been developed to focus on the embodied micro-mechanisms that bridge the intra- and interpsychological levels of reality through semiotic dynamics. Thinking as a semiotic relational process occurs in the dynamic sign-relations between the person observed, the observing person, and the "generalised other". This dynamic semiotic process happens at the personal, "I-Me" meaning-making level and at the cultural, "We-Us" level. 'Complex' relational patterns such as mutuality & integration are conceived to develop in support-amplifying semiotic loops of enhancement, while 'simpler' relational patterns such as reductionism & fragmentation are considered to develop in control-dampening semiotic loops of constraint. Using Thai food systems as a theoretical case, we consider ways Thai actors move through shifting sign positions as well as their likely semiotic mediational responses to 'crisis' situations. Thinking, in our relational sense, is not something individuals possess but something they do together semiotically, within culture, and across the evolving dynamics of cultural life.

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral ScienceVol. 60(4)
Gosford Hospital (AU), Clinical Research Organization (BD), Damien Foundation (BD), Rabdan Academy (AE), Srinakharinwirot University (TH), University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Representations and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.