Modeling resource conflict and inequality in fragile systems: A spatial agent-based framework with a Uganda case study

This study develops a spatial agent-based framework for examining how unequal resource access, environmental stress, institutional support, movement, and adaptive cooperation jointly shape conflict pressure and resource inequality. A Uganda case study initializes spatial heterogeneity from WorldPop 2020 population data and CHIRPS v2.0 October–November 2025 rainfall. The primary experiment uses an 80 × 80 grid, 250 agents, 120 time steps, and 20 baseline seeds. Parameter dependence is evaluated using 128 Latin-hypercube designs with five stochastic replicates per design, time-aware cluster-robust regressions, partial rank correlations, dense one-at-a-time sweeps, structural ablations, and grid/agent-count robustness checks. In the baseline ensemble, the Gini coefficient rises from 0.192 to 0.868 while mean cooperation falls from 0.547 to 0.118; conflict pressure stabilizes near 0.207 after an early transient. Institutional support increases cooperation and mean resources and reduces inequality over the tested range, while also altering the interaction-level conflict index, showing that lower modeled conflict is not necessarily a better system state. Removing the resource-disparity term reduces but does not eliminate conflict, and suppressing behavioral adaptation raises final conflict by about 40% relative to the baseline. The framework is therefore best interpreted as a transparent mechanism-exploration and stress-testing tool rather than an event-forecasting model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357283
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modeling resource conflict and inequality in fragile systems: A spatial agent-based framework with a Uganda case study

Ronald Katende
PLoS ONE
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
article

Modeling resource conflict and inequality in fragile systems: A spatial agent-based framework with a Uganda case study

Ronald Katende
article en

Abstract

This study develops a spatial agent-based framework for examining how unequal resource access, environmental stress, institutional support, movement, and adaptive cooperation jointly shape conflict pressure and resource inequality. A Uganda case study initializes spatial heterogeneity from WorldPop 2020 population data and CHIRPS v2.0 October–November 2025 rainfall. The primary experiment uses an 80 × 80 grid, 250 agents, 120 time steps, and 20 baseline seeds. Parameter dependence is evaluated using 128 Latin-hypercube designs with five stochastic replicates per design, time-aware cluster-robust regressions, partial rank correlations, dense one-at-a-time sweeps, structural ablations, and grid/agent-count robustness checks. In the baseline ensemble, the Gini coefficient rises from 0.192 to 0.868 while mean cooperation falls from 0.547 to 0.118; conflict pressure stabilizes near 0.207 after an early transient. Institutional support increases cooperation and mean resources and reduces inequality over the tested range, while also altering the interaction-level conflict index, showing that lower modeled conflict is not necessarily a better system state. Removing the resource-disparity term reduces but does not eliminate conflict, and suppressing behavioral adaptation raises final conflict by about 40% relative to the baseline. The framework is therefore best interpreted as a transparent mechanism-exploration and stress-testing tool rather than an event-forecasting model.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Kabale University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.