Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide According to Frailty Status

Importance Whether frailty influences the benefit-risk balance of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) is uncertain. Objective To evaluate whether frailty modifies the efficacy and safety of the GLP-1 RA semaglutide in adults with cardiovascular disease and overweight/obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, participants were adults with a body mass index of 27 or higher and established cardiovascular disease without diabetes. A 31-item frailty index (FI) was constructed using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach; participants were categorized as not frail (FI ≤0.210), more frail (FI 0.211-0.310), and most frail (FI ≥0.311). Interventions Semaglutide, 2.4 mg, once weekly or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Key secondary clinical outcomes, health-related quality-of-life (assessed by EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level [EQ-5D-5L] score), and safety events were additionally examined. Results Of 17 604 participants, the mean (SD) age was 61.6 (8.9) years; 12 732 patients (72.3%) were male and 4872 were female (27.7%). A total of 5432 patients (31%) had an FI up to 0.210, 8349 (47%) had an FI of 0.211 to 0.310, and 3823 (22%) had an FI 0.311 or higher. The incidence of the primary outcome increased with higher baseline FI. Benefits of semaglutide vs placebo on the primary outcome appeared consistent across the FI categories (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07, if the FI was ≤0.210; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82, if the FI was 0.211-0.310; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.10, if the FI was ≥0.311; P = .09 for interaction). Similar findings were observed when the FI was examined continuously ( P = .30 for interaction). Semaglutide additionally reduced the composite heart failure outcome ( P = .82 for interaction), all-cause hospitalization ( P = .71 for interaction), and all-cause mortality ( P = .28 for interaction) regardless of FI category. Benefits of semaglutide on EQ-5D-5L scores appeared larger with higher FI ( P = .02 for interaction). Between baseline and week 104, FI category was more likely to improve (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.80-3.37), and less likely to worsen (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65) with semaglutide vs placebo. The HRs for adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of semaglutide vs placebo appeared lower among participants with higher baseline FI ( P < .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance This study found that semaglutide demonstrated beneficial effects on a broad range of clinical outcomes in SELECT, without detectable heterogeneity by baseline FI. Benefits of semaglutide on health-related quality of life appeared greater with higher FI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03574597

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2026.3566
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide According to Frailty Status

Dotska Minkova, Adriana Villarino, Vanita R. Aroda, François St-Maurice et al.
JAMA Cardiology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide According to Frailty Status

Dotska Minkova, Adriana Villarino, Vanita R. Aroda, François St-Maurice, Marie‐France Langlois, Pierre Filteau, Y. Robitaille, Alejandro Porto, ALEXANDRA KAUTZKY-WILLER, Y. Yotov, Tamara Spaic, Jan Verwerft, Thomas Morville, Hermann Toplak, Mitra Shirazi, Walter P. Abhayaratna, Chris Vercammen, B. Georgiev, Claire Morbey, Jorge Plutzky, Alan Egan, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, George Tsoukas, Cíntia Cercato, Ursula Hanusch, Валери Гелев, Tzvetana Katova, Svetla Vasileva, Philippe Vanduynhoven, Susanne Käser, Naima Hammoudi, Michel De Pauw, R. Prager, DENISE FRANCO, Marcelo Casas, Hugo Lisboa, David Cross, Djamel E. Nibouche, Paul Poirier, Roy Allison, Amritanshu- S. Pandey, Subodh Verma, Philippe Van De Borne, Peter Purnell, Lilia N. Maia, Alejandra Oviedo, Hugo D. Sanabria, Mohamed Chettibi, Javier M. Farias, Melissa Leung, SELECT Trial Investigators, Maged William, John Stewart, David Lau, Zhulieta R. Prakova-Teneva, Mariya Tokmakova, David M. Colquhoun, Paulo Rossi, Ram Vijayaraghavan, Remi Rabasa-Lhoret, Flávia B. Arantes, Ildiko Lingvay, Snezhanka Tisheva- Gospodinova, Adrian P. Kormann, Jose F. Saraiva, Maria Quiroga, César J. Zaidman, Ivo Petrov, Dobrin Vassilev, Mathias Vrolix, Miguel Urina-Triana, Margaret Arstall, Karam Kostner, Ronald Bourgeois, Michael Hartleib, Nikolay Runev, Maria Milanova, Bernhard Ludvik, Elif I. Ekinci, John Amerena, Ernesto Duronto, Pedro S. Farsky, James Y. Cha, Sergio E. Kaiser, Elmar Aigner, Silmara O. Leite, Alberto G. Fonseca, G. Kees Hovingh, Eduardo Farias, Arman Postadzhiyan, Carolina Chacon, Yael Sofer, Sue Pedersen, Luiz E. Ritt, Benjamin M. Scirica, José C. Nicolau, A. Michael Lincoff, Luiz A. Turatti, Assen Goudev, John W. Ostrominski
article en

Abstract

Importance Whether frailty influences the benefit-risk balance of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) is uncertain. Objective To evaluate whether frailty modifies the efficacy and safety of the GLP-1 RA semaglutide in adults with cardiovascular disease and overweight/obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, participants were adults with a body mass index of 27 or higher and established cardiovascular disease without diabetes. A 31-item frailty index (FI) was constructed using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach; participants were categorized as not frail (FI ≤0.210), more frail (FI 0.211-0.310), and most frail (FI ≥0.311). Interventions Semaglutide, 2.4 mg, once weekly or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Key secondary clinical outcomes, health-related quality-of-life (assessed by EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level [EQ-5D-5L] score), and safety events were additionally examined. Results Of 17 604 participants, the mean (SD) age was 61.6 (8.9) years; 12 732 patients (72.3%) were male and 4872 were female (27.7%). A total of 5432 patients (31%) had an FI up to 0.210, 8349 (47%) had an FI of 0.211 to 0.310, and 3823 (22%) had an FI 0.311 or higher. The incidence of the primary outcome increased with higher baseline FI. Benefits of semaglutide vs placebo on the primary outcome appeared consistent across the FI categories (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07, if the FI was ≤0.210; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82, if the FI was 0.211-0.310; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.10, if the FI was ≥0.311; P = .09 for interaction). Similar findings were observed when the FI was examined continuously ( P = .30 for interaction). Semaglutide additionally reduced the composite heart failure outcome ( P = .82 for interaction), all-cause hospitalization ( P = .71 for interaction), and all-cause mortality ( P = .28 for interaction) regardless of FI category. Benefits of semaglutide on EQ-5D-5L scores appeared larger with higher FI ( P = .02 for interaction). Between baseline and week 104, FI category was more likely to improve (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.80-3.37), and less likely to worsen (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65) with semaglutide vs placebo. The HRs for adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation of semaglutide vs placebo appeared lower among participants with higher baseline FI ( P < .001 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance This study found that semaglutide demonstrated beneficial effects on a broad range of clinical outcomes in SELECT, without detectable heterogeneity by baseline FI. Benefits of semaglutide on health-related quality of life appeared greater with higher FI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03574597

JAMA Cardiology
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Clinical Trial Investigators (US), Universidad Simón Bolívar (CO), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.