Spatio-Temporal Shifts in Soil Nutrient Dynamics Under Different Fertilizer Sources in a Tomato Cropping System

Fertilizer source shapes soil nutrient dynamics in tomato systems, yet its effects across soil depths and crop season stages remain poorly understood. A two-year field experiment (2024–2025) was conducted on a Crider silt loam soil at Western Kentucky University Agriculture Research & Education Center to evaluate the effects of inorganic fertilizer (IF), organic fertilizer (OF), and an unfertilized control (CK) on soil nutrient concentrations across soil depths and sampling times, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Soil pH declined under fertilization (IF 6.7, OF 6.6 vs. CK 7.2; p < 0.01). Nitrate-N showed a treatment × depth × sampling time interaction in both years (p ≤ 0.04); IF and OF raised early-season nitrate-N, but concentrations matched CK by harvest. Phosphorus at 0–5 cm was greater under IF and OF than CK in both years (p < 0.001), and surface potassium more than doubled under both fertilizer treatments in 2024. Conversely, IF reduced calcium and magnesium during late-season sampling in 2024, whereas fertilization increased sulfur, iron and zinc, primarily in surface layers. Overall, organic fertilization matched inorganic nutrient dynamics, demonstrating comparable nutrient synchrony and effective soil fertility management in tomato production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Systems
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems10090106
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Spatio-Temporal Shifts in Soil Nutrient Dynamics Under Different Fertilizer Sources in a Tomato Cropping System

Becky Gilfillen, Navdeep Singh, Myrrisa Johnson, Md Jiad Ur Rahaman
Soil Systems
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Spatio-Temporal Shifts in Soil Nutrient Dynamics Under Different Fertilizer Sources in a Tomato Cropping System

Becky Gilfillen, Navdeep Singh, Myrrisa Johnson, Md Jiad Ur Rahaman
article en

Abstract

Fertilizer source shapes soil nutrient dynamics in tomato systems, yet its effects across soil depths and crop season stages remain poorly understood. A two-year field experiment (2024–2025) was conducted on a Crider silt loam soil at Western Kentucky University Agriculture Research & Education Center to evaluate the effects of inorganic fertilizer (IF), organic fertilizer (OF), and an unfertilized control (CK) on soil nutrient concentrations across soil depths and sampling times, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Soil pH declined under fertilization (IF 6.7, OF 6.6 vs. CK 7.2; p < 0.01). Nitrate-N showed a treatment × depth × sampling time interaction in both years (p ≤ 0.04); IF and OF raised early-season nitrate-N, but concentrations matched CK by harvest. Phosphorus at 0–5 cm was greater under IF and OF than CK in both years (p < 0.001), and surface potassium more than doubled under both fertilizer treatments in 2024. Conversely, IF reduced calcium and magnesium during late-season sampling in 2024, whereas fertilization increased sulfur, iron and zinc, primarily in surface layers. Overall, organic fertilization matched inorganic nutrient dynamics, demonstrating comparable nutrient synchrony and effective soil fertility management in tomato production systems.

Soil SystemsVol. 10(9)
Western Kentucky University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.