Composite biomaterials for 3D printing in biomedical applications

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing of composite biomaterials has emerged as a promising approach for developing patient-specific implants, tissue-engineered scaffolds, and other advanced biomedical applications. Materials and methods: This systematic review was reframed in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were prespecified information sources for studies published from 2014 to 2026. Eligibility was restricted to original peer-reviewed experimental studies involving additively manufactured composite biomaterials with quantitative characterization and biomedical relevance. The evidence set was reconciled to 50 identifiable primary studies, with a one-to-one study-characteristics map and explicit separation of contextual secondary references from included studies. Results: Polymer, ceramic, metal, and carbon-based composites fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), fused filament fabrication (FFF), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), direct ink writing (DIW), digital light processing (DLP), and light-assisted bio printing (LAB) demonstrated distinct advantages for different biomedical applications. Polymer–ceramic composites showed improved mechanical strength and osteoconductivity, while carbon- and metal-based composites enhanced electrical, magnetic, and multifunctional properties for applications such as biosensing, tissue regeneration, and localized drug delivery. However, challenges, including limited long-term in vivo evidence, lack of standardized evaluation protocols, manufacturing complexity, and regulatory barriers, continue to restrict widespread clinical translation. Conclusions: Composite biomaterials combined with advanced 3D printing technologies offer significant potential for personalized medicine and tissue engineering. Future progress will depend on optimizing material selection, standardizing evaluation methods, and improving clinical translation through multifunctional biomaterials and advanced fabrication strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Materials Science
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadmatsci8450
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Composite biomaterials for 3D printing in biomedical applications

Md Ushama Shafoyat, Kaiissar Mannoor, Nushrat Jahan Tanha, Syed Rashedul Haque et al.
Academia Materials Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Composite biomaterials for 3D printing in biomedical applications

Md Ushama Shafoyat, Kaiissar Mannoor, Nushrat Jahan Tanha, Syed Rashedul Haque, Md Asiqur Rahman Asif, Arpita Debnath, Sami Mohammad Ali
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing of composite biomaterials has emerged as a promising approach for developing patient-specific implants, tissue-engineered scaffolds, and other advanced biomedical applications. Materials and methods: This systematic review was reframed in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were prespecified information sources for studies published from 2014 to 2026. Eligibility was restricted to original peer-reviewed experimental studies involving additively manufactured composite biomaterials with quantitative characterization and biomedical relevance. The evidence set was reconciled to 50 identifiable primary studies, with a one-to-one study-characteristics map and explicit separation of contextual secondary references from included studies. Results: Polymer, ceramic, metal, and carbon-based composites fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), fused filament fabrication (FFF), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), direct ink writing (DIW), digital light processing (DLP), and light-assisted bio printing (LAB) demonstrated distinct advantages for different biomedical applications. Polymer–ceramic composites showed improved mechanical strength and osteoconductivity, while carbon- and metal-based composites enhanced electrical, magnetic, and multifunctional properties for applications such as biosensing, tissue regeneration, and localized drug delivery. However, challenges, including limited long-term in vivo evidence, lack of standardized evaluation protocols, manufacturing complexity, and regulatory barriers, continue to restrict widespread clinical translation. Conclusions: Composite biomaterials combined with advanced 3D printing technologies offer significant potential for personalized medicine and tissue engineering. Future progress will depend on optimizing material selection, standardizing evaluation methods, and improving clinical translation through multifunctional biomaterials and advanced fabrication strategies.

Academia Materials ScienceVol. 3(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Composite biomaterials for 3D printing in biomedical applications — Md Ushama Shafoyat, Kaiissar Mannoor, et al. · Academia Materials Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS