Predictors and prevalence of support for white nationalism in the United States

Abstract White nationalism has become increasingly visible in American public life 1–10 . Yet we lack knowledge of the predictors and prevalence of explicit support for this ideology, as survey research has treated it as a latent construct captured through indirect indicators 11–15 . We introduce and validate a measure that informs respondents of the core tenets of the white nationalist movement and then asks whether they support the movement. Expressed support is distinct from organizational affiliation with the movement, which we do not measure. Here we show with three national surveys of non-Hispanic white adults (conducted from 2021 to 2025) that support for white nationalism is (1) higher among white people encountering personal hardship and local social distress, consistent with strain theories 3,16 ; (2) unrelated to local racial composition or recent demographic change, complicating status threat accounts 4,17,18 ; and (3) elevated among white people with close friendships primarily online, consistent with theories of extremism driven by online mobilization 7,10,19 . Support for white nationalism is more common among white people with lower incomes and education, Republicans and conservatives, and those who are politically disaffected. In our national probability sample, prevalence of support was estimated at 4.9% of white adults, including 13.5% of white men aged 18–29. Support for white nationalism seems to constitute a discrete dimension of white racial attitudes, and many white people who endorse its core ideas are unaware of the label.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11018-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Predictors and prevalence of support for white nationalism in the United States

Patrick J Egan, Joshua A. Tucker, James Bisbee
1 citations
Nature
Social and Intergroup Psychology
15.24
article

Predictors and prevalence of support for white nationalism in the United States

Patrick J Egan, Joshua A. Tucker, James Bisbee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract White nationalism has become increasingly visible in American public life 1–10 . Yet we lack knowledge of the predictors and prevalence of explicit support for this ideology, as survey research has treated it as a latent construct captured through indirect indicators 11–15 . We introduce and validate a measure that informs respondents of the core tenets of the white nationalist movement and then asks whether they support the movement. Expressed support is distinct from organizational affiliation with the movement, which we do not measure. Here we show with three national surveys of non-Hispanic white adults (conducted from 2021 to 2025) that support for white nationalism is (1) higher among white people encountering personal hardship and local social distress, consistent with strain theories 3,16 ; (2) unrelated to local racial composition or recent demographic change, complicating status threat accounts 4,17,18 ; and (3) elevated among white people with close friendships primarily online, consistent with theories of extremism driven by online mobilization 7,10,19 . Support for white nationalism is more common among white people with lower incomes and education, Republicans and conservatives, and those who are politically disaffected. In our national probability sample, prevalence of support was estimated at 4.9% of white adults, including 13.5% of white men aged 18–29. Support for white nationalism seems to constitute a discrete dimension of white racial attitudes, and many white people who endorse its core ideas are unaware of the label.

Nature
New School (US), Vanderbilt University (US), New York University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
15.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.