Fixed-Anchor Euclidean TOPSIS for Prefix-Pruning Label Search under a Global Lower-Envelope Condition

Can a TOPSIS score safely prune partial walks before the terminal alternative set is known? Classical set-relative Euclidean TOPSIS cannot meet this timing requirement because its normalization and ideal points depend on the candidate set. We instead study Euclidean TOPSIS with exogenous anchors L < U and prove that its closeness score is well defined and strictly componentwise antitone on [L, U]. Consider a finite directed graph with componentwise nonnegative additive arc costs, and suppose that L is a componentwise lower envelope of every complete s-t walk. Under this condition, criterion-wise suffix bounds support admissible score pruning and extension-safe same-node dominance. Together with closed-subwalk erasure and a graph-size search horizon, these properties yield an exact walk-based label search and equality of the optimal feasible-walk and simple-path scores. The optimization model and its generic bound/dominance architecture fit established nonlinear resource-constrained shortest-path theory. The contribution is therefore a TOPSIS-specific certification and boundary analysis: a mutually nondominated example exposes candidate-set dependence, while further counterexamples identify why dominance and terminal arguments can fail when the lower anchor is nonredundant.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22794921
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Fixed-Anchor Euclidean TOPSIS for Prefix-Pruning Label Search under a Global Lower-Envelope Condition

Chizuru
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
preprint

Fixed-Anchor Euclidean TOPSIS for Prefix-Pruning Label Search under a Global Lower-Envelope Condition

Chizuru
preprint en

Abstract

Can a TOPSIS score safely prune partial walks before the terminal alternative set is known? Classical set-relative Euclidean TOPSIS cannot meet this timing requirement because its normalization and ideal points depend on the candidate set. We instead study Euclidean TOPSIS with exogenous anchors L < U and prove that its closeness score is well defined and strictly componentwise antitone on [L, U]. Consider a finite directed graph with componentwise nonnegative additive arc costs, and suppose that L is a componentwise lower envelope of every complete s-t walk. Under this condition, criterion-wise suffix bounds support admissible score pruning and extension-safe same-node dominance. Together with closed-subwalk erasure and a graph-size search horizon, these properties yield an exact walk-based label search and equality of the optimal feasible-walk and simple-path scores. The optimization model and its generic bound/dominance architecture fit established nonlinear resource-constrained shortest-path theory. The contribution is therefore a TOPSIS-specific certification and boundary analysis: a mutually nondominated example exposes candidate-set dependence, while further counterexamples identify why dominance and terminal arguments can fail when the lower anchor is nonredundant.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fixed-Anchor Euclidean TOPSIS for Prefix-Pruning Label Search under a Global Lower-Envelope Condition — Chizuru · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS