Bridging the AI Governance Gap: Higher Education Leadership Strategies for Aligning Policy Frameworks, Academic Integrity, and Quality Assurance

AI Governance Is a Leadership Responsibility Higher education is facing an AI governance gap that directly affects academic integrity, quality assurance, and equity. My qualitative multi‑case study reveals how institutions interpret AI use, revise policies, and distribute resources—and where leadership must act. “This study examines how higher education leadership strategies address the AI governance gap by aligning institutional policy frameworks with academic integrity and quality assurance requirements.” The findings show that AI governance is a policy system, not a single document. Leadership must align AI policies with academic integrity, assessment, quality standards, and equitable access to technology. Without that alignment, students and faculty experience fragmented expectations and uneven support. This work provides a roadmap for leaders committed to responsible, equitable, academically rigorous AI integration across their institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22799960
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bridging the AI Governance Gap: Higher Education Leadership Strategies for Aligning Policy Frameworks, Academic Integrity, and Quality Assurance

MopelolaO Fatile
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Bridging the AI Governance Gap: Higher Education Leadership Strategies for Aligning Policy Frameworks, Academic Integrity, and Quality Assurance

MopelolaO Fatile
article en

Abstract

AI Governance Is a Leadership Responsibility Higher education is facing an AI governance gap that directly affects academic integrity, quality assurance, and equity. My qualitative multi‑case study reveals how institutions interpret AI use, revise policies, and distribute resources—and where leadership must act. “This study examines how higher education leadership strategies address the AI governance gap by aligning institutional policy frameworks with academic integrity and quality assurance requirements.” The findings show that AI governance is a policy system, not a single document. Leadership must align AI policies with academic integrity, assessment, quality standards, and equitable access to technology. Without that alignment, students and faculty experience fragmented expectations and uneven support. This work provides a roadmap for leaders committed to responsible, equitable, academically rigorous AI integration across their institutions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Grand Canyon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the AI Governance Gap: Higher Education Leadership Strategies for Aligning Policy Frameworks, Academic Integrity, and Quality Assurance — MopelolaO Fatile · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS