Paired In Vitro Susceptibility of Cefiderocol and Colistin in Colistin-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Single-Centre, MIC-Based Analysis of 236 Clinical Isolates

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli increasingly exhaust therapeutic options, leaving colistin and cefiderocol as last-resort agents. We assessed whether cefiderocol retains in vitro activity against colistin-resistant isolates, without inferring clinical efficacy. We analysed 236 non-duplicate XDR Gram-negative isolates from 220 patients. Cefiderocol and colistin MICs were determined via reference broth microdilution with EUCAST-required quality control (iron-depleted broth for cefiderocol; mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 for colistin) and interpreted using species-specific EUCAST v16.1 (2026) breakpoints (cefiderocol: Enterobacterales S ≤ 2, I 4, R > 4 mg/L; Pseudomonas aeruginosa S ≤ 2, R > 2 mg/L; colistin: P. aeruginosa S ≤ 4 mg/L). Because EUCAST publishes no clinical cefiderocol breakpoint for Acinetobacter baumannii, the primary analysis comprised species with breakpoints for both agents (n = 150; 126 paired); A. baumannii is reported as an MIC distribution and the pooled 236-isolate comparison as secondary. In the primary analysis, 120/150 isolates (80.0%) were cefiderocol-susceptible at standard or increased exposure. Among paired isolates, cefiderocol covered 77.0% versus 43.7% for colistin; agreement was negligible (Cohen’s κ = 0.020), with 54 isolates favouring cefiderocol and 12 the reverse (McNemar p < 0.001). Conditional in vitro susceptibility among 71 colistin-resistant isolates was 76.1% (95% CI 65.0–84.5), giving 33.3 percentage points of incremental coverage and one additional cefiderocol-susceptible isolate per 2.3 matched isolates tested. Secondary analyses were directionally consistent (incremental coverage 21.8–33.3 points). These in vitro findings support paired testing of both agents to identify isolates retaining cefiderocol activity when colistin does not; clinical benefit was not assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14092071
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Paired In Vitro Susceptibility of Cefiderocol and Colistin in Colistin-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Single-Centre, MIC-Based Analysis of 236 Clinical Isolates

H Branea, Felix Bratosin, Elena Hogea, Ciprian Nicolae Pilut et al.
Microorganisms
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Paired In Vitro Susceptibility of Cefiderocol and Colistin in Colistin-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: A Single-Centre, MIC-Based Analysis of 236 Clinical Isolates

H Branea, Felix Bratosin, Elena Hogea, Ciprian Nicolae Pilut, Oana Plavițu, Livia Stanga, Andra-Nicole Rusnac
article en

Abstract

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli increasingly exhaust therapeutic options, leaving colistin and cefiderocol as last-resort agents. We assessed whether cefiderocol retains in vitro activity against colistin-resistant isolates, without inferring clinical efficacy. We analysed 236 non-duplicate XDR Gram-negative isolates from 220 patients. Cefiderocol and colistin MICs were determined via reference broth microdilution with EUCAST-required quality control (iron-depleted broth for cefiderocol; mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 for colistin) and interpreted using species-specific EUCAST v16.1 (2026) breakpoints (cefiderocol: Enterobacterales S ≤ 2, I 4, R > 4 mg/L; Pseudomonas aeruginosa S ≤ 2, R > 2 mg/L; colistin: P. aeruginosa S ≤ 4 mg/L). Because EUCAST publishes no clinical cefiderocol breakpoint for Acinetobacter baumannii, the primary analysis comprised species with breakpoints for both agents (n = 150; 126 paired); A. baumannii is reported as an MIC distribution and the pooled 236-isolate comparison as secondary. In the primary analysis, 120/150 isolates (80.0%) were cefiderocol-susceptible at standard or increased exposure. Among paired isolates, cefiderocol covered 77.0% versus 43.7% for colistin; agreement was negligible (Cohen’s κ = 0.020), with 54 isolates favouring cefiderocol and 12 the reverse (McNemar p < 0.001). Conditional in vitro susceptibility among 71 colistin-resistant isolates was 76.1% (95% CI 65.0–84.5), giving 33.3 percentage points of incremental coverage and one additional cefiderocol-susceptible isolate per 2.3 matched isolates tested. Secondary analyses were directionally consistent (incremental coverage 21.8–33.3 points). These in vitro findings support paired testing of both agents to identify isolates retaining cefiderocol activity when colistin does not; clinical benefit was not assessed.

MicroorganismsVol. 14(9)
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Spitalul Clinic Dr. Victor Babes (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.