The Operation of Dysconscious Ableism in Public Librarianship

Public libraries strive to promote justice and inclusion, yet disabled patrons and staff often encounter systemic barriers. This study introduces dysconscious ableism —a distorted understanding of disability that tacitly accepts ableist norms—into library and information science (LIS) discourse. Using critical theory, ethnographic interviews with 10 librarians, and critical discourse and policy analysis of 52 public library policies, the research examines how dysconscious ableism operates in professional beliefs and institutional practices. Findings reveal deficit-based discourses framing disability through medicalized, burdensome, and dependent lenses, alongside policies that employ vague behavioral standards, uphold inaccessible procedures, and perpetuate the status quo. These patterns marginalize disabled individuals and legitimize injustice. The article calls for critical reflection, inclusive policy reform, and universal design to disrupt ableist norms and advance disability justice in librarianship.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Library Quarterly
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/742590
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Operation of Dysconscious Ableism in Public Librarianship

William Norton Myhill
The Library Quarterly
Library Science and Administration
article

The Operation of Dysconscious Ableism in Public Librarianship

William Norton Myhill
article en

Abstract

Public libraries strive to promote justice and inclusion, yet disabled patrons and staff often encounter systemic barriers. This study introduces dysconscious ableism —a distorted understanding of disability that tacitly accepts ableist norms—into library and information science (LIS) discourse. Using critical theory, ethnographic interviews with 10 librarians, and critical discourse and policy analysis of 52 public library policies, the research examines how dysconscious ableism operates in professional beliefs and institutional practices. Findings reveal deficit-based discourses framing disability through medicalized, burdensome, and dependent lenses, alongside policies that employ vague behavioral standards, uphold inaccessible procedures, and perpetuate the status quo. These patterns marginalize disabled individuals and legitimize injustice. The article calls for critical reflection, inclusive policy reform, and universal design to disrupt ableist norms and advance disability justice in librarianship.

The Library QuarterlyVol. 96(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.