From invitation to eviction: How plants control arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is often presented as a linear sequence of fungal recognition, root colonization, arbuscule formation, and nutrient exchange. This view underrepresents the repeated regulatory transitions through which plants influence symbiotic establishment, function, and persistence. Here, we propose a checkpoint framework organized around invitation, admission, accommodation, investment, maintenance, and termination and renewal. We examine how nutrient status, carbon availability, hormonal and immune signaling, systemic root-shoot communication, and environmental context regulate fungal recruitment, intracellular entry, interface construction, resource exchange, and arbuscule turnover. We distinguish strong mechanistic evidence from correlative observations and emphasize that gene expression, colonization abundance, or arbuscule degeneration alone do not demonstrate resource flux, performance-sensitive evaluation, partner-level sanction, or selective interface termination. Evidence is strongest for plant control of presymbiotic signaling, cellular accommodation, interface construction and resourcing, nutrient acquisition, and regulated arbuscule turnover. By contrast, direct performance-sensitive evaluation of individual fungal interfaces remains insufficiently demonstrated. AM fungi also providing regulatory inputs: fungal signals, secreted molecules, and small RNAs can modify host processes, while fungal physiology and extraradical networks influence nutrient acquisition and allocation. Plant control is therefore substantial but not absolute, operating through asymmetrical, reciprocal regulation across interface, whole-plant, and fungal-network scales. We conclude by outlining experiments that link fungal nutrient contribution, plant response or allocation, and subsequent fate at the same interface, with fungal fitness additionally required for claims of partner-level sanction. Such experiments provide tests for distinguishing developmental and physiological regulation from performance-sensitive interface maintenance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Signaling & Behavior
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2026.2733232
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From invitation to eviction: How plants control arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

Ying Sun, Usman Zulfiqar, Mohd Asif Shah, Shakal Khan Korai et al.
Plant Signaling & Behavior
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

From invitation to eviction: How plants control arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

Ying Sun, Usman Zulfiqar, Mohd Asif Shah, Shakal Khan Korai, Sokhibjon Abdusamatov, Anvar Rakhmatov, Shengnan Li, Shahrukh Khan, Marvi Korai, Mohammed S. Alotaibi
article en

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is often presented as a linear sequence of fungal recognition, root colonization, arbuscule formation, and nutrient exchange. This view underrepresents the repeated regulatory transitions through which plants influence symbiotic establishment, function, and persistence. Here, we propose a checkpoint framework organized around invitation, admission, accommodation, investment, maintenance, and termination and renewal. We examine how nutrient status, carbon availability, hormonal and immune signaling, systemic root-shoot communication, and environmental context regulate fungal recruitment, intracellular entry, interface construction, resource exchange, and arbuscule turnover. We distinguish strong mechanistic evidence from correlative observations and emphasize that gene expression, colonization abundance, or arbuscule degeneration alone do not demonstrate resource flux, performance-sensitive evaluation, partner-level sanction, or selective interface termination. Evidence is strongest for plant control of presymbiotic signaling, cellular accommodation, interface construction and resourcing, nutrient acquisition, and regulated arbuscule turnover. By contrast, direct performance-sensitive evaluation of individual fungal interfaces remains insufficiently demonstrated. AM fungi also providing regulatory inputs: fungal signals, secreted molecules, and small RNAs can modify host processes, while fungal physiology and extraradical networks influence nutrient acquisition and allocation. Plant control is therefore substantial but not absolute, operating through asymmetrical, reciprocal regulation across interface, whole-plant, and fungal-network scales. We conclude by outlining experiments that link fungal nutrient contribution, plant response or allocation, and subsequent fate at the same interface, with fungal fitness additionally required for claims of partner-level sanction. Such experiments provide tests for distinguishing developmental and physiological regulation from performance-sensitive interface maintenance.

Plant Signaling & BehaviorVol. 21(1)
Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK), Taif University (SA), Kardan University (AF), Potato Research Institute (CZ), Parwan University (AF), National University of Uzbekistan (UZ), Nakhchivan State University (AZ), Yangzhou University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.