Resisting Erasure Through Transnational Digital Queer Literacies

This study examines how a transnational queer learner from Japan, “Amy,” mobilizes transnational queer digital literacies (TQDL) to navigate and resist cisheteronormative and raciolinguistic discourses across Japanese and U.S. contexts. Drawing on interviews, journals, and Instagram posts, this instrumental case study brings queer literacies, transnational literacies, and raciolinguistic inquiry into conversation to conceptualize TQDL as multimodal, affective, and critical meaning-making practices. The findings reveal three interrelated themes: negotiating queer illegibility across contexts, developing critical resistance through reflection and self-representation, and restorying belonging through digital visibility, critique, and solidarity. Together, these findings show how digital platforms function as affective, translingual, and political spaces where queer learners make themselves visible, process exclusion, and seek recognition across uneven transnational conditions. This study contributes to queer literacies scholarship by showing how digital self-representation is shaped by multilingual movement, cross-border audience negotiation, and raciolinguistic legibility, and it positions TQDL as a framework for understanding how queer individuals use digital practices to contest erasure and imagine more livable futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377261476985
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Resisting Erasure Through Transnational Digital Queer Literacies

Chi Cheng Chang
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Resisting Erasure Through Transnational Digital Queer Literacies

Chi Cheng Chang
article en

Abstract

This study examines how a transnational queer learner from Japan, “Amy,” mobilizes transnational queer digital literacies (TQDL) to navigate and resist cisheteronormative and raciolinguistic discourses across Japanese and U.S. contexts. Drawing on interviews, journals, and Instagram posts, this instrumental case study brings queer literacies, transnational literacies, and raciolinguistic inquiry into conversation to conceptualize TQDL as multimodal, affective, and critical meaning-making practices. The findings reveal three interrelated themes: negotiating queer illegibility across contexts, developing critical resistance through reflection and self-representation, and restorying belonging through digital visibility, critique, and solidarity. Together, these findings show how digital platforms function as affective, translingual, and political spaces where queer learners make themselves visible, process exclusion, and seek recognition across uneven transnational conditions. This study contributes to queer literacies scholarship by showing how digital self-representation is shaped by multilingual movement, cross-border audience negotiation, and raciolinguistic legibility, and it positions TQDL as a framework for understanding how queer individuals use digital practices to contest erasure and imagine more livable futures.

Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
University of British Columbia (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resisting Erasure Through Transnational Digital Queer Literacies — Chi Cheng Chang · Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS