Development of the Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Violence by Patients and Patients’ Relatives Scale: A Methodological Study

Violence against nurses is a global occupational health and safety issue, yet instruments that assess nurses’ attitudes towards violence from patients and their relatives are limited. This methodological study involved the development and evaluation of the Nurses’ Attitudes Towards Violence by Patients and Patients’ Relatives Scale. In the qualitative phase, 39 nurses were interviewed in depth until data saturation was reached, generating a pool of 61 items. Content validity with 15 experts (CVI = 0.90) yielded a draft of 57 items. The original quantitative sample (N = 608) was randomly divided into exploratory (n = 304) and confirmatory (n = 304) subsamples. Principal axis factoring with ProMax rotation supported a 36-item, three-factor solution that explained 52.3% of the common variance. This solution comprised the following factors: perception and causes of violence (20 items); effects of violence (13 items); and response to violence (3 items). In the original confirmatory subsample, the final model with six theory-based residual covariances was subjected to WLSMV confirmatory factor analysis, showing an overall acceptable fit (χ2(585) = 1297.5, χ2/df = 2.22, CFI = 0.900, TLI = 0.892, RMSEA = 0.063 [90% CI 0.059–0.068], SRMR = 0.093). A robustness wave involving 45 additional nurses, conducted between 27 August and 2 September 2026, produced almost identical results when combined with the confirmatory subsample (n = 349). Supplementary analyses supported composite reliability and discriminant validity, and found that measurement invariance was supported across institution type, whereas findings regarding sex invariance were interpreted as preliminary. In the original sample of N = 608, Cronbach’s α was 0.943, 0.930 and 0.842 for the three factors, and 0.950 for the total scale. Two-week test–retest reliability was r = 0.976. The scale provides a multidimensional measure of nurses’ evaluative-attributional beliefs, perceived effects and responses to violence from patients and relatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091665
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development of the Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Violence by Patients and Patients’ Relatives Scale: A Methodological Study

Deniz Gür, Ülkü BAYKAL
Behavioral Sciences
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Development of the Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Violence by Patients and Patients’ Relatives Scale: A Methodological Study

Deniz Gür, Ülkü BAYKAL
article en

Abstract

Violence against nurses is a global occupational health and safety issue, yet instruments that assess nurses’ attitudes towards violence from patients and their relatives are limited. This methodological study involved the development and evaluation of the Nurses’ Attitudes Towards Violence by Patients and Patients’ Relatives Scale. In the qualitative phase, 39 nurses were interviewed in depth until data saturation was reached, generating a pool of 61 items. Content validity with 15 experts (CVI = 0.90) yielded a draft of 57 items. The original quantitative sample (N = 608) was randomly divided into exploratory (n = 304) and confirmatory (n = 304) subsamples. Principal axis factoring with ProMax rotation supported a 36-item, three-factor solution that explained 52.3% of the common variance. This solution comprised the following factors: perception and causes of violence (20 items); effects of violence (13 items); and response to violence (3 items). In the original confirmatory subsample, the final model with six theory-based residual covariances was subjected to WLSMV confirmatory factor analysis, showing an overall acceptable fit (χ2(585) = 1297.5, χ2/df = 2.22, CFI = 0.900, TLI = 0.892, RMSEA = 0.063 [90% CI 0.059–0.068], SRMR = 0.093). A robustness wave involving 45 additional nurses, conducted between 27 August and 2 September 2026, produced almost identical results when combined with the confirmatory subsample (n = 349). Supplementary analyses supported composite reliability and discriminant validity, and found that measurement invariance was supported across institution type, whereas findings regarding sex invariance were interpreted as preliminary. In the original sample of N = 608, Cronbach’s α was 0.943, 0.930 and 0.842 for the three factors, and 0.950 for the total scale. Two-week test–retest reliability was r = 0.976. The scale provides a multidimensional measure of nurses’ evaluative-attributional beliefs, perceived effects and responses to violence from patients and relatives.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(9)
Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Istanbul Commerce University (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.