Old Forgeries in Modern Libraries

Fakes and forgeries present distinctive problems to the management of special collections. Recent cases have demonstrated the interconnection between the production of modern fakes and issues of theft and security. However, much less attention has been paid to the subject of older antedated fakes that have, at one time or another, been acquired by libraries and cataloged as though they were authentic originals. This article provides an overview of the challenges presented by the inaccurate or partial cataloging of fakes, outlines useful methods for identifying such books, suggests how they might be most helpfully described in catalogs, identifies examples of good practice, and traces some of the curatorial opportunities that these books present. Improperly described, forgeries confuse library users, muddy the waters of scholarship, and weaken collection security. But when properly identified, they enable library users to approach a collection from new and unexpected angles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Library Quarterly
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/742589
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Old Forgeries in Modern Libraries

Jacqueline Hylkema, Joseph Hone
The Library Quarterly
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Old Forgeries in Modern Libraries

Jacqueline Hylkema, Joseph Hone
article en

Abstract

Fakes and forgeries present distinctive problems to the management of special collections. Recent cases have demonstrated the interconnection between the production of modern fakes and issues of theft and security. However, much less attention has been paid to the subject of older antedated fakes that have, at one time or another, been acquired by libraries and cataloged as though they were authentic originals. This article provides an overview of the challenges presented by the inaccurate or partial cataloging of fakes, outlines useful methods for identifying such books, suggests how they might be most helpfully described in catalogs, identifies examples of good practice, and traces some of the curatorial opportunities that these books present. Improperly described, forgeries confuse library users, muddy the waters of scholarship, and weaken collection security. But when properly identified, they enable library users to approach a collection from new and unexpected angles.

The Library QuarterlyVol. 96(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.