Cell‐Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk

ABSTRACT Objective To assess concordance between cell‐free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre‐implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk. Method This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT‐A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell‐free DNA screening alone ( n = 317), amniocentesis alone ( n = 500), or both tests ( n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard. Results In the dual‐testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high‐risk cell‐free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low‐risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7–97.3), 97.3% (94.3–98.8), 12.5% (0.6–53.3) and 99.6% (97.5–99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%). Conclusion After PGT‐A, cell‐free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk‐stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high‐risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70249
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cell‐Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk

Yueping Zhang, Yun Sun, Yichao Niu, Ting Zhang et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Cell‐Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk

Yueping Zhang, Yun Sun, Yichao Niu, Ting Zhang, Yaqiong He, Yi Huang, Shuo Zhang, Yao Lu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To assess concordance between cell‐free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre‐implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk. Method This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT‐A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell‐free DNA screening alone ( n = 317), amniocentesis alone ( n = 500), or both tests ( n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard. Results In the dual‐testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high‐risk cell‐free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low‐risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7–97.3), 97.3% (94.3–98.8), 12.5% (0.6–53.3) and 99.6% (97.5–99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%). Conclusion After PGT‐A, cell‐free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk‐stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high‐risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Renji Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.