Territorial allocation of EU Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure

This paper analyses the regional allocation of Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure across 207 NUTS 2 regions in 22 EU Member States during the 2014-2020 programming period. Although previous research has mainly examined waste-management outcomes and, in some cases, the effects of public support, much less is known about how infrastructure investment itself is distributed across territories. An original regional database is constructed from Kohesio project-location information and combined with baseline indicators of landfill dependence, municipal waste generation per capita, institutional quality, GDP per capita, population density and tourism intensity. The empirical strategy distinguishes between the extensive margin, defined as the probability that a region receives investment, and the intensive margin, defined as per capita investment intensity among recipient regions. It also separates investment in sorting-recycling measures from investment in treatment-disposal measures. The results show that investment receipt was more common in regions with lower GDP per capita and lower institutional quality, a pattern partly linked to the territorial structure of Cohesion Policy and cross-country programme take-up. Investment intensity, however, was more closely related to baseline waste-management conditions. Among recipient regions, higher total and sorting-recycling investment intensity was associated with stronger landfill dependence, while treatment-disposal investment intensity was more closely associated with municipal waste generation per capita. The allocation of waste-management investment is therefore better understood by considering not only whether support reaches a region, but also its intensity and the type of infrastructure financed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115868
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Territorial allocation of EU Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure

Mercedes Rodríguez, José Antonio Camacho Ballesta
Waste Management
Regional Development and Policy
article

Territorial allocation of EU Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure

Mercedes Rodríguez, José Antonio Camacho Ballesta
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses the regional allocation of Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure across 207 NUTS 2 regions in 22 EU Member States during the 2014-2020 programming period. Although previous research has mainly examined waste-management outcomes and, in some cases, the effects of public support, much less is known about how infrastructure investment itself is distributed across territories. An original regional database is constructed from Kohesio project-location information and combined with baseline indicators of landfill dependence, municipal waste generation per capita, institutional quality, GDP per capita, population density and tourism intensity. The empirical strategy distinguishes between the extensive margin, defined as the probability that a region receives investment, and the intensive margin, defined as per capita investment intensity among recipient regions. It also separates investment in sorting-recycling measures from investment in treatment-disposal measures. The results show that investment receipt was more common in regions with lower GDP per capita and lower institutional quality, a pattern partly linked to the territorial structure of Cohesion Policy and cross-country programme take-up. Investment intensity, however, was more closely related to baseline waste-management conditions. Among recipient regions, higher total and sorting-recycling investment intensity was associated with stronger landfill dependence, while treatment-disposal investment intensity was more closely associated with municipal waste generation per capita. The allocation of waste-management investment is therefore better understood by considering not only whether support reaches a region, but also its intensity and the type of infrastructure financed.

Waste ManagementVol. 227
Universidad de Granada (ES), Parque Tecnológico de la Salud (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Territorial allocation of EU Cohesion Policy investment in household waste-management infrastructure — Mercedes Rodríguez, José Antonio Camacho Ballesta · Waste Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS