Semantic Typology of Demonstratives

While traditional semantic accounts of demonstratives assume spatial contrast to be fundamental, typological studies reveal that the encoded meanings go well beyond physical distance and involve contrasts in perceptual and epistemic access. This article reviews the main findings from typological studies and the implications they have for the semantic analysis of demonstratives. The typological picture suggests that a uniformly applicable analysis puts very little into the lexical meaning of demonstratives, allowing for contextual information to determine their denotation differently across contexts and languages. By keeping the inherent semantics of demonstratives minimal and allowing language-specific conventionalizations of contextual information, we can bridge the gap between the typological observations and formal semantic theories of demonstratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Linguistics
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-041624-105429
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Semantic Typology of Demonstratives

Dorothy Ahn
Annual Review of Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Semantic Typology of Demonstratives

Dorothy Ahn
article en

Abstract

While traditional semantic accounts of demonstratives assume spatial contrast to be fundamental, typological studies reveal that the encoded meanings go well beyond physical distance and involve contrasts in perceptual and epistemic access. This article reviews the main findings from typological studies and the implications they have for the semantic analysis of demonstratives. The typological picture suggests that a uniformly applicable analysis puts very little into the lexical meaning of demonstratives, allowing for contextual information to determine their denotation differently across contexts and languages. By keeping the inherent semantics of demonstratives minimal and allowing language-specific conventionalizations of contextual information, we can bridge the gap between the typological observations and formal semantic theories of demonstratives.

Annual Review of Linguistics
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Semantic Typology of Demonstratives — Dorothy Ahn · Annual Review of Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS