Handwriting and Fine-Motor Assessment for Affordable Parkinson Evaluation: Reliability Limits, Stable Confounding, and the Burden of Repetition

Abstract Handwriting assessment requires sufficient valid recordings, comparable measurement conditions, and a payment arrangement that permits completion. This article combines a targeted literature synthesis with hypothetical calculations of acquisition design, integer repetition requirements, patient budgets, and false change after a device offset. Established variance-component algebra supplies a background reliability constraint rather than a new measurement principle. Three stipulated acquisition options require nine, four, or three valid trials to reach target reliability of at least 0.75. Including acquisition-improvement costs, their provider expenditures are thirteen, eleven, and thirteen resource units. At two units per attempted trial and an eight-unit patient budget, only the latter two options are affordable when all captures succeed. They form distinct tradeoffs between provider resources and repetition burden. A failed-capture extension fixes the four-valid-trial option and assumes independent validity probability 0.80. An allowance of four attempts produces four valid trials only 40.96% of the time; six allowed attempts increase that probability to 90.112%. These are technical acquisition-completion probabilities, not diagnostic outcomes. A three-unit bundle permits the longer allowance without increasing the patient's bill, while the provider still finances unsuccessful attempts. Separately, a 0.40-unit device offset produces approximately 16.5% false-change probability for nine-trial averages under a nominal 5% threshold. The analysis distinguishes measurement adequacy, affordability, and diagnostic validity. It supports testing acquisition quality and device agreement before imposing repeat charges, without claiming actual prices, clinical thresholds, or validated NeuralCipher performance. Article details NeuralCipherai; Kadir Tamrak; Salih Yaldız; Feride Yaldız; Ömer Ağyol; Yavuz Selim Silay; Hasan Randa Targeted narrative synthesis and original analytical acquisition-design study Compares a discrete acquisition-cost and repetition frontier under an explicit reliability criterion and patient budget; derives capped acquisition-completion probabilities and costs under per-attempt, per-valid-capture and bundled payment; quantifies false change after a fixed device offset. Standard variance decomposition is supporting background. Project: NeuralCipher. Bibliographic records are supplied in BibTeX and RIS formats for reference-management software, including Zotero. Reproducible calculations and figure data accompany the article. References Adams, J. L., Kangarloo, T., Tracey, B., O’Donnell, P., Volfson, D., Latzman, R. D., Zach, N., Alexander, R., Bergethon, P., Cosman, J., Anderson, D., Best, A., Severson, J., Kostrzebski, M. A., Auinger, P., Wilmot, P., Pohlson, Y., Waddell, E., Jensen-Roberts, S., . . . the Parkinson Study Group Watch-PD Study Investigators and Collaborators. (2023). Using a smartwatch and smartphone to assess early Parkinson’s disease in the WATCH-PD study. npj Parkinson's Disease, 9(1), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00497-x Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 Bot, B. M., Suver, C., Neto, E. C., Kellen, M., Klein, A., Bare, C., Doerr, M., Pratap, A., Wilbanks, J., Dorsey, E. R., Friend, S. H., & Trister, A. D. (2016). The mPower study, Parkinson disease mobile data collected using ResearchKit. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 160011. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.11 Cetin, B. N., Comoglu, S., Ulker, A. C., & Onder, H. (2026). Dissociable handwriting domains in Parkinson’s disease? Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70812 Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J. B., van Smeden, M., Boulesteix, A.-L., Camaradou, J. C., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Glocker, B., Golub, R. M., Harvey, H., Heinze, G., . . . Logullo, P. (2024). TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385, Article e078378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378 de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 Diaz-Feliz, L., Sanz-Cartagena, P., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Arbelo-Gonzalez, J., & Garcia-Ruiz, P. (2024). Computerized assessment of handwriting in de novo Parkinson's disease: A kinematic study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 126, Article 107072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107072 Drotár, P., Mekyska, J., Rektorová, I., Masarová, L., Smékal, Z., & Faundez-Zanuy, M. (2014). Analysis of in-air movement in handwriting: A novel marker for Parkinson's disease. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 117(3), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.007 Drotár, P., Mekyska, J., Rektorová, I., Masarová, L., Smékal, Z., & Faundez-Zanuy, M. (2016). Evaluation of handwriting kinematics and pressure for differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 67, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2016.01.004 Evers, L. J. W., Krijthe, J. H., Meinders, M. J., Bloem, B. R., & Heskes, T. M. (2019). Measuring Parkinson's disease over time: The real‐world within‐subject reliability of the MDS‐UPDRS. Movement Disorders, 34(10), 1480–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27790 Goetz, C. G., Tilley, B. C., Shaftman, S. R., Stebbins, G. T., Fahn, S., Martinez‐Martin, P., Poewe, W., Sampaio, C., Stern, M. B., Dodel, R., Dubois, B., Holloway, R., Jankovic, J., Kulisevsky, J., Lang, A. E., Lees, A., Leurgans, S., LeWitt, P. A., Nyenhuis, D., . . . LaPelle, N. (2008). Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Movement Disorders, 23(15), 2129–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22340 Kapoor, S., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns, 4(9), Article 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804 Liu, H., Deng, H., Wang, L., Wang, X., & Mo, M. (2026). Multitype hand writing as a digital marker for Parkinson's disease. Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 15, Article 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100480 Moons, K. G. M., Damen, J. A. A., Kaul, T., Hooft, L., Andaur Navarro, C., Dhiman, P., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Ghassemi, M., Heinze, G., Kengne, A. P., Maier-Hein, L., Liu, X., Logullo, P., McCradden, M. D., Liu, N., . . . van Smeden, M. (2025). PROBAST+AI: An updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods. BMJ, 388, Article e082505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082505 Postuma, R. B., Berg, D., Stern, M., Poewe, W., Olanow, C. W., Oertel, W., Obeso, J., Marek, K., Litvan, I., Lang, A. E., Halliday, G., Goetz, C. G., Gasser, T., Dubois, B., Chan, P., Bloem, B. R., Adler, C. H., & Deuschl, G. (2015). MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 30(12), 1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26424 Rosenblum, S., Samuel, M., Zlotnik, S., Erikh, I., & Schlesinger, I. (2013). Handwriting as an objective tool for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. Journal of Neurology, 260(9), 2357–2361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6996-x Saeb, S., Lonini, L., Jayaraman, A., Mohr, D. C., & Kording, K. P. (2017). The need to approximate the use-case in clinical machine learning. GigaScience, 6(5), Article gix019. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix019 Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 Smits, E. J., Tolonen, A. J., Cluitmans, L., van Gils, M., Conway, B. A., Zietsma, R. C., Leenders, K. L., & Maurits, N. M. (2014). Standardized handwriting to assess bradykinesia, micrographia and tremor in Parkinson's disease. PLoS ONE, 9(5), Article e97614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097614 Zham, P., Kumar, D. K., Dabnichki, P., Poosapadi Arjunan, S., & Raghav, S. (2017). Distinguishing different stages of Parkinson’s disease using composite index of speed and pen-pressure of sketching a spiral. Frontiers in Neurology, 8, Article 435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00435