The impact of New York City's Open Streets Program on local traffic

In recent years, there has been growing popularity in urban policies that prioritize pedestrians by reallocating road space away from motorized vehicles, with a focus on active transportation such as walking and cycling, as well as public transit. However, there is limited research exploring the traffic implications of such policies. New York City's (NYC) Open Streets Program, launched in April 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to provide outdoor respite and expand access to public space by closing or restricting traffic on select streets. While prior research has suggested health-relevant impacts of Open Streets programs on physical activity, social cohesion, and noise, their impact on local traffic is not well understood. Therefore, we conducted a propensity score–matched difference-in-differences analysis at the census tract level using highly spatially resolved, NYC-wide crowdsourced monthly average daily traffic data. Comparing traffic for census tracts pre-implementation (2019) and post-implementation (2021) of Open Streets, we found an average 13.4% reduction (95% CI: −17.9%, −8.9%) in traffic in tracts with Open Streets compared to pretreatment levels. Moreover, we observed a reduction in traffic (−0.42%, 95% CI: −0.51%, −0.33%) with each percentage point increase in contiguous treated census tracts, suggesting that traffic reductions may be greater where Open Streets are clustered. This study offers insights into the application of a robust research method for evaluating the environmental outcomes of road space reallocation schemes. Additionally, it contributes to understanding the effectiveness of Open Streets in reducing local traffic exposure and informs policy design to create more pedestrian-friendly and healthier urban neighborhoods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2026.107501
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The impact of New York City's Open Streets Program on local traffic

Jaime Benavides, Mark Seaman, Sabah Usmani, Darby Jack et al.
Cities
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

The impact of New York City's Open Streets Program on local traffic

Jaime Benavides, Mark Seaman, Sabah Usmani, Darby Jack, Wu Xiao, Heather McBrien, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Andrew G. Rundle
article en

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing popularity in urban policies that prioritize pedestrians by reallocating road space away from motorized vehicles, with a focus on active transportation such as walking and cycling, as well as public transit. However, there is limited research exploring the traffic implications of such policies. New York City's (NYC) Open Streets Program, launched in April 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, aimed to provide outdoor respite and expand access to public space by closing or restricting traffic on select streets. While prior research has suggested health-relevant impacts of Open Streets programs on physical activity, social cohesion, and noise, their impact on local traffic is not well understood. Therefore, we conducted a propensity score–matched difference-in-differences analysis at the census tract level using highly spatially resolved, NYC-wide crowdsourced monthly average daily traffic data. Comparing traffic for census tracts pre-implementation (2019) and post-implementation (2021) of Open Streets, we found an average 13.4% reduction (95% CI: −17.9%, −8.9%) in traffic in tracts with Open Streets compared to pretreatment levels. Moreover, we observed a reduction in traffic (−0.42%, 95% CI: −0.51%, −0.33%) with each percentage point increase in contiguous treated census tracts, suggesting that traffic reductions may be greater where Open Streets are clustered. This study offers insights into the application of a robust research method for evaluating the environmental outcomes of road space reallocation schemes. Additionally, it contributes to understanding the effectiveness of Open Streets in reducing local traffic exposure and informs policy design to create more pedestrian-friendly and healthier urban neighborhoods.

CitiesVol. 179
New York City Department of Transportation (US), Brown University (US), New York University (US), Columbia University (US)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.