What women football coaches want: Exploring the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning in women football coaches

Women football coaches often experience learning within male-dominated environments, which can significantly shape their experiences and development opportunities. This study explored the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning among women football coaches, examining whether their current learning aligns with their perceived needs. A mixed methods survey was completed by 52 women coaches holding a minimum UEFA C qualification. Results revealed clear detachment between how coaches currently learn and how they would prefer to learn, with preferences for relational (mentoring and role models), situated (shadowing), and structured (internal continuous professional development) learning opportunities; all of which were significantly underrepresented in their actual experiences (e.g., mentoring: 38.5% vs. 92.3%, p < .0001; shadowing: 25% vs. 78.8%, p < .0001; internal CPD: 32.7% vs. 61.5%, = p < .0015; external CPD: 71.2% vs. 86.5%, p < .049). These findings highlight the need for more tailored coach education approaches that better reflect the learning preferences and lived experiences of women coaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261489185
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What women football coaches want: Exploring the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning in women football coaches

Dave Jackson, Laura Hodgson, Kevin Braybrook, Adam L. Kelly
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

What women football coaches want: Exploring the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning in women football coaches

Dave Jackson, Laura Hodgson, Kevin Braybrook, Adam L. Kelly
article en

Abstract

Women football coaches often experience learning within male-dominated environments, which can significantly shape their experiences and development opportunities. This study explored the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning among women football coaches, examining whether their current learning aligns with their perceived needs. A mixed methods survey was completed by 52 women coaches holding a minimum UEFA C qualification. Results revealed clear detachment between how coaches currently learn and how they would prefer to learn, with preferences for relational (mentoring and role models), situated (shadowing), and structured (internal continuous professional development) learning opportunities; all of which were significantly underrepresented in their actual experiences (e.g., mentoring: 38.5% vs. 92.3%, p < .0001; shadowing: 25% vs. 78.8%, p < .0001; internal CPD: 32.7% vs. 61.5%, = p < .0015; external CPD: 71.2% vs. 86.5%, p < .049). These findings highlight the need for more tailored coach education approaches that better reflect the learning preferences and lived experiences of women coaches.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Birmingham City University (GB), Youth Development (US)
Quality Education, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What women football coaches want: Exploring the actual and preferred forms and sources of learning in women football coaches — Dave Jackson, Laura Hodgson, et al. · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS