A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care

Lorel Mureșan,1 Dionisio Franco Barattini,2 Laura Simona Ianoși,3 Carlo Signorini,4 Rawia Harb51Medical Department, S.C. Salvosan Ciobanca, Zalău, Romania; 2Medical Department, Opera CRO, a Tigermed Company, Timișoara, Romania; 3Medical Department, Centrul Medical Dr. Ianosi S.R.L., Craiova, Romania; 4QA Department, Signorini Medicale S.R.L., Albaredo d’Adige, Italy; 5Clinical Operations Department, Tigermed Italy S.R.L., Genova, ItalyCorrespondence: Dionisio Franco Barattini, Medical Department, Opera CRO, a Tigermed company, Strada Cozia nr. 10, Timișoara, 300209, Romania, Email [email protected]: Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.Materials and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II–III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥ 3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (< 10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22± 2.78 to 1.31± 1.49 in burns (p< 0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67± 2.41 to 3.29± 1.60 in pressure ulcers (p< 0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥ 5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p< 0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.Conclusion: In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332.Keywords: pressure ulcers, burn wounds, silver ions, zeolite, wound healing, primary care, real-world evidence

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-09-14
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care

Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb, Dionisio Barattini, Laura Ianoși et al.
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care

Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb, Dionisio Barattini, Laura Ianoși, Lorel Mureșan
article en

Abstract

Lorel Mureșan,1 Dionisio Franco Barattini,2 Laura Simona Ianoși,3 Carlo Signorini,4 Rawia Harb51Medical Department, S.C. Salvosan Ciobanca, Zalău, Romania; 2Medical Department, Opera CRO, a Tigermed Company, Timișoara, Romania; 3Medical Department, Centrul Medical Dr. Ianosi S.R.L., Craiova, Romania; 4QA Department, Signorini Medicale S.R.L., Albaredo d’Adige, Italy; 5Clinical Operations Department, Tigermed Italy S.R.L., Genova, ItalyCorrespondence: Dionisio Franco Barattini, Medical Department, Opera CRO, a Tigermed company, Strada Cozia nr. 10, Timișoara, 300209, Romania, Email [email protected]: Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.Materials and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II–III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥ 3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (< 10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22± 2.78 to 1.31± 1.49 in burns (p< 0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67± 2.41 to 3.29± 1.60 in pressure ulcers (p< 0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥ 5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p< 0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.Conclusion: In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332.Keywords: pressure ulcers, burn wounds, silver ions, zeolite, wound healing, primary care, real-world evidence

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.