Single-Bolus Sequential Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography: Image Quality and Radiation Dose on Wide-Area Detector and Dual-Source CT

Background/Objectives: Single-pass triple-rule-out computed tomography (CT) angiography (TRO-CTA) must compromise among differing pulmonary, coronary, and aortic contrast-transit times. Wide-area detector CT (WAD-CT) and dual-source CT (DSCT) offer different coverage, temporal resolution, and dose profiles, but direct comparative evidence for a sequential single-bolus strategy is limited in selected emergency patients with overlapping concern for acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, or acute aortic syndrome. We compared territory-specific image quality and radiation dose; diagnostic accuracy was not assessed. Methods: This retrospective study included 114 adults (WAD-CT, n = 60; DSCT, n = 54). After test-bolus timing, one weight-based diagnostic bolus was used for sequential pulmonary, electrocardiography-synchronized coronary, and non-gated aortic acquisitions. Attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), blinded dual-reader quality scores, and radiation dose were compared by territory. Results: Mean overall scores across the two readers were ≥3 for every examination in all phases. WAD-CT showed higher pulmonary trunk SNR (19.5 ± 8.9 vs. 14.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.002), higher ascending aortic SNR (24.9 ± 11.4 vs. 14.2 ± 3.0; p < 0.001), lower coronary and aortic noise, and 38.1% lower total estimated dose (6.40 ± 1.72 vs. 10.34 ± 6.91 mSv; p < 0.001). DSCT showed higher right coronary attenuation (671.8 ± 186.7 vs. 466.4 ± 128.9 Hounsfield units; p < 0.001), no significant difference in right coronary SNR (p = 0.681), and less aortic-root pulsation artifact (p < 0.001). Pulmonary- and coronary-phase overall scores were comparable. Conclusions: Both protocols provided acceptable territory-level image quality from one diagnostic bolus. WAD-CT provided lower coronary and aortic noise and estimated radiation dose, whereas DSCT provided higher coronary attenuation and less aortic-root pulsation artifact. Diagnostic accuracy and performance in subsegmental pulmonary arteries and distal or small coronary branches remain unestablished.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187166
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Single-Bolus Sequential Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography: Image Quality and Radiation Dose on Wide-Area Detector and Dual-Source CT

Sung Min Ko, Hyunjung Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Sung-Jin Cha
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Single-Bolus Sequential Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography: Image Quality and Radiation Dose on Wide-Area Detector and Dual-Source CT

Sung Min Ko, Hyunjung Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Sung-Jin Cha
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Single-pass triple-rule-out computed tomography (CT) angiography (TRO-CTA) must compromise among differing pulmonary, coronary, and aortic contrast-transit times. Wide-area detector CT (WAD-CT) and dual-source CT (DSCT) offer different coverage, temporal resolution, and dose profiles, but direct comparative evidence for a sequential single-bolus strategy is limited in selected emergency patients with overlapping concern for acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, or acute aortic syndrome. We compared territory-specific image quality and radiation dose; diagnostic accuracy was not assessed. Methods: This retrospective study included 114 adults (WAD-CT, n = 60; DSCT, n = 54). After test-bolus timing, one weight-based diagnostic bolus was used for sequential pulmonary, electrocardiography-synchronized coronary, and non-gated aortic acquisitions. Attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), blinded dual-reader quality scores, and radiation dose were compared by territory. Results: Mean overall scores across the two readers were ≥3 for every examination in all phases. WAD-CT showed higher pulmonary trunk SNR (19.5 ± 8.9 vs. 14.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.002), higher ascending aortic SNR (24.9 ± 11.4 vs. 14.2 ± 3.0; p < 0.001), lower coronary and aortic noise, and 38.1% lower total estimated dose (6.40 ± 1.72 vs. 10.34 ± 6.91 mSv; p < 0.001). DSCT showed higher right coronary attenuation (671.8 ± 186.7 vs. 466.4 ± 128.9 Hounsfield units; p < 0.001), no significant difference in right coronary SNR (p = 0.681), and less aortic-root pulsation artifact (p < 0.001). Pulmonary- and coronary-phase overall scores were comparable. Conclusions: Both protocols provided acceptable territory-level image quality from one diagnostic bolus. WAD-CT provided lower coronary and aortic noise and estimated radiation dose, whereas DSCT provided higher coronary attenuation and less aortic-root pulsation artifact. Diagnostic accuracy and performance in subsegmental pulmonary arteries and distal or small coronary branches remain unestablished.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.