Trump's Revisionism and the Liberal Economic Order: Disruptive Coercion, Roving Banditry, and International Disorder From Within

ABSTRACT Scholars have paid limited attention to exploring international disorder emanating from the disorderly conduct of the dominant power. The United States, under Donald Trump, is actively undermining the essential elements of the American‐led liberal economic order—commercial openness, a network of institutions and regimes, and nondiscriminatory provision of essential public goods—that the United States created after the Second World War. How can we conceptualize and explain such a situation in which the dominant power actively undermines (from within) the very order that it helped establish in the first place? While employing Olson's conceptual frame of “roving banditry”—also characterized by “coercive leadership” and “international disorder”—this study argues that Trump's international conduct, especially in his second term, should be conceptualized as roving banditry because Trump coercively extracts private profits and contributes little to the system's overall functioning due to his minimal stakes in the long‐term sustenance of the system. This is demonstrated by Trump's practice of rent seeking and private extraction through discriminatory protectionism, economic retaliation, and transactional trade deals that bypass traditional multilateral bodies. While taking Trump's 5 years in office as an empirical reference point, the study further argues that Trump, like a roving bandit who practices coercion, weaponizes interdependence, bypasses systemic rules, and denies any contribution to public goods while coercively undermining and abandoning the system's essential components at will. Related Articles Moynihan, D. 2025. “Trump, Personalism, and US Administrative Capacity.” Politics & Policy 53, no. 4: e70059. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70059 . Merry, M. K. 2022. “Trump's Tweets as Policy Narratives: Constructing the Immigration Issue via Social Media.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 4: 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12487 . Garrett, T. M. 2020. “The Security Apparatus, Federal Magistrate Courts, and Detention Centers as Simulacra: The Effects of Trump's Zero Tolerance Policy on Migrants and Refugees in the Rio Grande Valley.” Politics & Policy 48, no. 2: 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12348 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics &amp Policy
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70183
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Trump's Revisionism and the Liberal Economic Order: Disruptive Coercion, Roving Banditry, and International Disorder From Within

Humayun Javed
Politics &amp Policy
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Trump's Revisionism and the Liberal Economic Order: Disruptive Coercion, Roving Banditry, and International Disorder From Within

Humayun Javed
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scholars have paid limited attention to exploring international disorder emanating from the disorderly conduct of the dominant power. The United States, under Donald Trump, is actively undermining the essential elements of the American‐led liberal economic order—commercial openness, a network of institutions and regimes, and nondiscriminatory provision of essential public goods—that the United States created after the Second World War. How can we conceptualize and explain such a situation in which the dominant power actively undermines (from within) the very order that it helped establish in the first place? While employing Olson's conceptual frame of “roving banditry”—also characterized by “coercive leadership” and “international disorder”—this study argues that Trump's international conduct, especially in his second term, should be conceptualized as roving banditry because Trump coercively extracts private profits and contributes little to the system's overall functioning due to his minimal stakes in the long‐term sustenance of the system. This is demonstrated by Trump's practice of rent seeking and private extraction through discriminatory protectionism, economic retaliation, and transactional trade deals that bypass traditional multilateral bodies. While taking Trump's 5 years in office as an empirical reference point, the study further argues that Trump, like a roving bandit who practices coercion, weaponizes interdependence, bypasses systemic rules, and denies any contribution to public goods while coercively undermining and abandoning the system's essential components at will. Related Articles Moynihan, D. 2025. “Trump, Personalism, and US Administrative Capacity.” Politics & Policy 53, no. 4: e70059. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70059 . Merry, M. K. 2022. “Trump's Tweets as Policy Narratives: Constructing the Immigration Issue via Social Media.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 4: 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12487 . Garrett, T. M. 2020. “The Security Apparatus, Federal Magistrate Courts, and Detention Centers as Simulacra: The Effects of Trump's Zero Tolerance Policy on Migrants and Refugees in the Rio Grande Valley.” Politics & Policy 48, no. 2: 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12348 .

Politics &amp PolicyVol. 54(5)
University of Delaware (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.