Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nivolumab Versus Axitinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Center Experience

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of nivolumab and axitinib as second-line treatments in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who had progressed after one prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with mRCC who received nivolumab or axitinib as second-line treatment at two centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment with PFS and OS after adjustment for International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group and year of second-line treatment initiation. Results: Nineteen patients received nivolumab, and 49 received axitinib. Median PFS was 9.27 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.75–12.79) with nivolumab and 5.87 months (95% CI, 4.73–7.01) with axitinib (log-rank p = 0.011). Median OS was 48.27 months (95% CI, 4.16–92.37) and 30.20 months (95% CI, 19.95–40.44), respectively (log-rank p = 0.027). In multivariable analysis, axitinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of progression or death compared with nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR], 3.494; 95% CI, 1.690–7.225; p = 0.001). IMDC risk group was also significantly associated with PFS (overall p = 0.003), whereas year of second-line treatment initiation was not (HR, 1.070; 95% CI, 0.883–1.296; p = 0.489). For OS, axitinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of death compared with nivolumab (HR, 2.410; 95% CI, 1.200–4.838; p = 0.013), while neither IMDC risk group (overall p = 0.477) nor treatment year (HR, 1.102; 95% CI, 0.922–1.317; p = 0.286) was significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: In this two-center retrospective cohort, nivolumab was associated with longer PFS and OS than axitinib in the second-line treatment of mRCC, and these associations remained significant after adjustment for IMDC risk group and year of treatment initiation. However, the retrospective design, small sample size, imbalance in treatment allocation and nephrectomy rates, and potential residual confounding limit causal interpretation. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187146
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nivolumab Versus Axitinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Center Experience

Oktay Bozkurt, İrfan Buğday, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Mevlüde İnanç et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nivolumab Versus Axitinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Center Experience

Oktay Bozkurt, İrfan Buğday, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Mevlüde İnanç, Metin Özkan
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of nivolumab and axitinib as second-line treatments in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who had progressed after one prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with mRCC who received nivolumab or axitinib as second-line treatment at two centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment with PFS and OS after adjustment for International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group and year of second-line treatment initiation. Results: Nineteen patients received nivolumab, and 49 received axitinib. Median PFS was 9.27 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.75–12.79) with nivolumab and 5.87 months (95% CI, 4.73–7.01) with axitinib (log-rank p = 0.011). Median OS was 48.27 months (95% CI, 4.16–92.37) and 30.20 months (95% CI, 19.95–40.44), respectively (log-rank p = 0.027). In multivariable analysis, axitinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of progression or death compared with nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR], 3.494; 95% CI, 1.690–7.225; p = 0.001). IMDC risk group was also significantly associated with PFS (overall p = 0.003), whereas year of second-line treatment initiation was not (HR, 1.070; 95% CI, 0.883–1.296; p = 0.489). For OS, axitinib was associated with a significantly higher risk of death compared with nivolumab (HR, 2.410; 95% CI, 1.200–4.838; p = 0.013), while neither IMDC risk group (overall p = 0.477) nor treatment year (HR, 1.102; 95% CI, 0.922–1.317; p = 0.286) was significantly associated with OS. Conclusions: In this two-center retrospective cohort, nivolumab was associated with longer PFS and OS than axitinib in the second-line treatment of mRCC, and these associations remained significant after adjustment for IMDC risk group and year of treatment initiation. However, the retrospective design, small sample size, imbalance in treatment allocation and nephrectomy rates, and potential residual confounding limit causal interpretation. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.