US Influence in Post‐Assad Syria and the Limits of Turkey's Leverage

Abstract In early 2026, the post‐Assad government in Damascus weakened the Kurdish‐led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and began integrating the group through phased incorporation and gradual reassertion of state authority. While this advanced some Turkish objectives, it demonstrated the limits of Ankara's influence: Kurdish fighters were incorporated into Syria's military in SDF brigades rather than as individuals. This article contends that Turkey's access, proximity, and coercive capacity did not allow it to impose its preferences. Political and economic costs limited Turkey's ability to use military force to secure a preferable outcome. Instead, Syria's actions were shaped by its need to preserve security functions that counter the Islamic State, and to continue its international financial and diplomatic reintegration. In addition to underscoring the boundaries of Turkish leverage, the article demonstrates that the United States continues to affect the post‐Assad order through security, financial, and diplomatic means. American influence operates less through direct control than by shaping the conditions under which alternative outcomes become feasible. Given the competing external powers seeking to advance their interests, Syria will likely remain loosely unitary and asymmetrically integrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Policy
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.70098
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

US Influence in Post‐Assad Syria and the Limits of Turkey's Leverage

Barış Çağlar
Middle East Policy
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

US Influence in Post‐Assad Syria and the Limits of Turkey's Leverage

Barış Çağlar
article en

Abstract

Abstract In early 2026, the post‐Assad government in Damascus weakened the Kurdish‐led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and began integrating the group through phased incorporation and gradual reassertion of state authority. While this advanced some Turkish objectives, it demonstrated the limits of Ankara's influence: Kurdish fighters were incorporated into Syria's military in SDF brigades rather than as individuals. This article contends that Turkey's access, proximity, and coercive capacity did not allow it to impose its preferences. Political and economic costs limited Turkey's ability to use military force to secure a preferable outcome. Instead, Syria's actions were shaped by its need to preserve security functions that counter the Islamic State, and to continue its international financial and diplomatic reintegration. In addition to underscoring the boundaries of Turkish leverage, the article demonstrates that the United States continues to affect the post‐Assad order through security, financial, and diplomatic means. American influence operates less through direct control than by shaping the conditions under which alternative outcomes become feasible. Given the competing external powers seeking to advance their interests, Syria will likely remain loosely unitary and asymmetrically integrated.

Middle East PolicyVol. 33(4)
Center for Strategic and International Studies (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

US Influence in Post‐Assad Syria and the Limits of Turkey's Leverage — Barış Çağlar · Middle East Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS