On the Derivation of Logarithmic Corrections to Holographic Dark Energy

The phenomenological parameters α and β appearing in entropy-corrected holographic dark energy (ECHDE) are generally expected to be related to the quantum gravity coefficients γ and δ associated with logarithmic entropy corrections. However, the precise form of this relation can depend on how the dark energy density is derived from horizon thermodynamics. In this work, we consider two approaches: the first law of thermodynamics (dE = T dS) applied to a cosmological horizon, and a holographic scaling argument based on horizon degrees of freedom (ρ ∝ S / L 4 ). We find that, within the thermodynamic framework, logarithmic contributions do not explicitly appear under standard assumptions, whereas the holographic counting approach can retain such corrections more naturally. By comparing the two perspectives, we propose a possible mapping between (α, β) and (γ, δ), offering a tentative microscopic interpretation for these otherwise phenomenological parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Physics Letters A
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s021773232650255x
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

On the Derivation of Logarithmic Corrections to Holographic Dark Energy

M. Faruk Karabat
Modern Physics Letters A
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

On the Derivation of Logarithmic Corrections to Holographic Dark Energy

M. Faruk Karabat
article en

Abstract

The phenomenological parameters α and β appearing in entropy-corrected holographic dark energy (ECHDE) are generally expected to be related to the quantum gravity coefficients γ and δ associated with logarithmic entropy corrections. However, the precise form of this relation can depend on how the dark energy density is derived from horizon thermodynamics. In this work, we consider two approaches: the first law of thermodynamics (dE = T dS) applied to a cosmological horizon, and a holographic scaling argument based on horizon degrees of freedom (ρ ∝ S / L 4 ). We find that, within the thermodynamic framework, logarithmic contributions do not explicitly appear under standard assumptions, whereas the holographic counting approach can retain such corrections more naturally. By comparing the two perspectives, we propose a possible mapping between (α, β) and (γ, δ), offering a tentative microscopic interpretation for these otherwise phenomenological parameters.

Modern Physics Letters A
Twitter (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.