Evaluation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δCCSD(T)MP2, calculated using small valence basis sets

In the focal-point estimation of the coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] interaction energies followed by extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit, the most critical and challenging step is the rapid and accurate calculation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δMP2CCSDT, which represents the difference between CCSD(T) and MP2 interaction energies at a small basis set. In this study, using calculations with the widely used aug-cc-pVDZ (aVDZ) basis set as the benchmark, we primarily evaluated the reliability of calculating δMP2CCSDT with the much smaller valence basis set vDZP and its diffuse-function-augmented version vDZPD. The results show that with the vDZP basis set, the mean MAD and RMSD of δMP2CCSDT across five benchmark datasets for noncovalent interactions (S22, S66, X40, HSG, and NCIBLIND10) are 0.14 and 0.18 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating relatively large deviations. In contrast, the vDZPD basis set yields much lower average MAD and RMSD of only 0.02 and 0.04 kcal/mol, demonstrating high computational accuracy. Using the vDZPD basis set to calculate noncovalent systems containing around 30-50 atoms, the δMP2CCSDT computation time is saved by about 40%. Furthermore, the results show that the δMP2CCSDT/vDZPD corrections still maintain high accuracy in calculating metal-containing complexes. The CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energy benchmark can be pushed to the hundred-atom scale with vDZPD basis set, holding significant promise for widespread application in the study of large noncovalent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0347054
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δCCSD(T)MP2, calculated using small valence basis sets

Weizhou Wang, Yi‐Bo Wang, Tao Sun
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Crystallography and molecular interactions
article

Evaluation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δCCSD(T)MP2, calculated using small valence basis sets

Weizhou Wang, Yi‐Bo Wang, Tao Sun
article en

Abstract

In the focal-point estimation of the coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] interaction energies followed by extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit, the most critical and challenging step is the rapid and accurate calculation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δMP2CCSDT, which represents the difference between CCSD(T) and MP2 interaction energies at a small basis set. In this study, using calculations with the widely used aug-cc-pVDZ (aVDZ) basis set as the benchmark, we primarily evaluated the reliability of calculating δMP2CCSDT with the much smaller valence basis set vDZP and its diffuse-function-augmented version vDZPD. The results show that with the vDZP basis set, the mean MAD and RMSD of δMP2CCSDT across five benchmark datasets for noncovalent interactions (S22, S66, X40, HSG, and NCIBLIND10) are 0.14 and 0.18 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating relatively large deviations. In contrast, the vDZPD basis set yields much lower average MAD and RMSD of only 0.02 and 0.04 kcal/mol, demonstrating high computational accuracy. Using the vDZPD basis set to calculate noncovalent systems containing around 30-50 atoms, the δMP2CCSDT computation time is saved by about 40%. Furthermore, the results show that the δMP2CCSDT/vDZPD corrections still maintain high accuracy in calculating metal-containing complexes. The CCSD(T)/CBS interaction energy benchmark can be pushed to the hundred-atom scale with vDZPD basis set, holding significant promise for widespread application in the study of large noncovalent systems.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 165(11)
Guizhou University (CN), Luoyang Normal University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.