The Patient–AI Relationship in Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Cognitive-Behavioral Framework

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a passive information tool into a responsive conversational system. For individuals with obsessive–compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) that are, in part, maintained by safety behaviors and other negative reinforcement loops, large language models (LLMs) can function as highly available, potentially sycophantic, and readily repeatable sources of reassurance that may undermine the principles of exposure and response prevention (ERP). Measurement paradigms inherited from the early digital era (e.g., screen time and problematic internet use) were not designed to capture these relational dynamics. In this perspective, we propose a cognitive-behavioral framework for conceptualizing and assessing patient–AI relationships in the OCRDs. We argue that generative AI may interfere with exposure-based treatment (by eroding therapeutic friction), the discomfort, delay, and uncertainty on which corrective learning depends. We suggest that this occurs through three interlocking mechanisms: supernormal stimuli, algorithmic sycophancy, and digital accommodation. We propose an assessment architecture that records the context of AI use and rates five functional domains: Emotional Reliance, Reassurance and Checking, Anthropomorphic Attribution, Epistemic Trust, and Displacement. Adjunct ratings capture adaptive benefit, global interference, concealment, and safety-relevant exchanges. Hypothesized digital phenotypes may be derived from the domain-level profiles. We conclude by outlining a cognitive-behavioral approach to treatment planning for AI-facilitated reassurance seeking and discussing implications for safeguarding internal validity in research. We argue that structured inquiry into the patient–AI relationship belongs in OCRD assessment and research design, and we offer the present framework as a testable approach whose measurement properties remain to be established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187154
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Patient–AI Relationship in Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Cognitive-Behavioral Framework

Brian A. Zaboski, Kyle King, Emmi Sugino
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
article

The Patient–AI Relationship in Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Cognitive-Behavioral Framework

Brian A. Zaboski, Kyle King, Emmi Sugino
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a passive information tool into a responsive conversational system. For individuals with obsessive–compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) that are, in part, maintained by safety behaviors and other negative reinforcement loops, large language models (LLMs) can function as highly available, potentially sycophantic, and readily repeatable sources of reassurance that may undermine the principles of exposure and response prevention (ERP). Measurement paradigms inherited from the early digital era (e.g., screen time and problematic internet use) were not designed to capture these relational dynamics. In this perspective, we propose a cognitive-behavioral framework for conceptualizing and assessing patient–AI relationships in the OCRDs. We argue that generative AI may interfere with exposure-based treatment (by eroding therapeutic friction), the discomfort, delay, and uncertainty on which corrective learning depends. We suggest that this occurs through three interlocking mechanisms: supernormal stimuli, algorithmic sycophancy, and digital accommodation. We propose an assessment architecture that records the context of AI use and rates five functional domains: Emotional Reliance, Reassurance and Checking, Anthropomorphic Attribution, Epistemic Trust, and Displacement. Adjunct ratings capture adaptive benefit, global interference, concealment, and safety-relevant exchanges. Hypothesized digital phenotypes may be derived from the domain-level profiles. We conclude by outlining a cognitive-behavioral approach to treatment planning for AI-facilitated reassurance seeking and discussing implications for safeguarding internal validity in research. We argue that structured inquiry into the patient–AI relationship belongs in OCRD assessment and research design, and we offer the present framework as a testable approach whose measurement properties remain to be established.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Patient–AI Relationship in Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Cognitive-Behavioral Framework — Brian A. Zaboski, Kyle King, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS