‘The worst of all Turkish peoples’: Ibn Faḍlān’s travel account as British naval intelligence

Abstract The tenth-century CE Arabic travel account of Aḥmad Ibn Faḍlān has seen many reactions, receptions, and afterlives in Islamicate languages and in European settings. These relate both to the identity and presumed authority of Ibn Faḍlān as an eyewitness observer and presumed diplomat, and to the contents of his account. Considering different presentations of Ibn Faḍlān’s role and identity, this article approaches reactions to and uses of Ibn Faḍlān’s descriptions of the Bāshghird, particularly within a 1918 British military intelligence document, in order to consider Ibn Faḍlān’s potential as an imperial agent who could make authoritative and lasting judgements on an Orientalized other. Drawing on a combination of British imperial political thought and Volga-Ural local historical writing, descriptions of the Bāshghird by Ibn Faḍlān are weighed against Sara Ahmed’s reflections on ethnographic authority.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-026-00429-x
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

‘The worst of all Turkish peoples’: Ibn Faḍlān’s travel account as British naval intelligence

Tonicha Mae Upham
postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

‘The worst of all Turkish peoples’: Ibn Faḍlān’s travel account as British naval intelligence

Tonicha Mae Upham
article en

Abstract

Abstract The tenth-century CE Arabic travel account of Aḥmad Ibn Faḍlān has seen many reactions, receptions, and afterlives in Islamicate languages and in European settings. These relate both to the identity and presumed authority of Ibn Faḍlān as an eyewitness observer and presumed diplomat, and to the contents of his account. Considering different presentations of Ibn Faḍlān’s role and identity, this article approaches reactions to and uses of Ibn Faḍlān’s descriptions of the Bāshghird, particularly within a 1918 British military intelligence document, in order to consider Ibn Faḍlān’s potential as an imperial agent who could make authoritative and lasting judgements on an Orientalized other. Drawing on a combination of British imperial political thought and Volga-Ural local historical writing, descriptions of the Bāshghird by Ibn Faḍlān are weighed against Sara Ahmed’s reflections on ethnographic authority.

postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.