Global management of drug-drug interaction in patients with prostate cancer: international survey by Meet-URO group and ONCOassist

Abstract Background Patients with prostate cancer (PC) frequently receive multiple medications for comorbidities, increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Despite guidelines highlighting DDI relevance, data on real-world management are limited. This international survey aimed to characterize current practices, barriers, and needs in this setting. Materials and methods A self-administered, multiple-choice online survey was sent to 3342 Italian oncologists (AIOM/Meet-URO members) and 19139 global healthcare professionals via the ONCOassist app. A part of the survey included optional case studios completed only by Italian respondents. Results Responses were received by 69 healthcare professionals in Italy and 1064 worldwide. Overall, DDIs were widely recognized as clinically relevant in PC care. Digital tools (online databases and smartphone applications) were the most frequently used resources for DDI assessment in both cohorts, whereas AI-based tools were limited. Italian oncologists reported limited on-site pharmacologist access (29%), while global respondents reported more frequent pharmacologist support (76%). Common barriers included time constraints, uncertain reliability of sources, and lack of training. When DDI checkers conflicted, Italian and global respondents favored pharmacologist consultation, although global users relied also on literature (31%) and clinical judgment (26%). Proposed solutions differed between cohorts: Italian clinicians emphasized the need for greater access to pharmacologists’ support, whereas the global cohort highlighted institutional training and educational initiatives. Clinical scenarios demonstrated awareness of specific DDI risks, with cautious selection of ARTAs and co-medications in line with current recommendations. Conclusion Although limited by potential selection bias and restricted generalizability, these findings suggest that strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration could enhance patient safety and optimize therapy outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag360
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Global management of drug-drug interaction in patients with prostate cancer: international survey by Meet-URO group and ONCOassist

Lakshmi Ramachandran, Massimo Di Maïo, Kevin Bambury, Elisa Zanardi et al.
The Oncologist
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Global management of drug-drug interaction in patients with prostate cancer: international survey by Meet-URO group and ONCOassist

Lakshmi Ramachandran, Massimo Di Maïo, Kevin Bambury, Elisa Zanardi, Mattia Di Civita, Eoin O’Carroll, Michele Maffezzoli, Giuseppe Procopio, Maria Concetta Cursano, Fiorenza Santamaria, Anna Amela Valsecchi, Renita George, Richard Bambury, Daniele Santini, Stefania Kingspergher, Suleka Ashok, Giuseppe Luigi Banna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with prostate cancer (PC) frequently receive multiple medications for comorbidities, increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Despite guidelines highlighting DDI relevance, data on real-world management are limited. This international survey aimed to characterize current practices, barriers, and needs in this setting. Materials and methods A self-administered, multiple-choice online survey was sent to 3342 Italian oncologists (AIOM/Meet-URO members) and 19139 global healthcare professionals via the ONCOassist app. A part of the survey included optional case studios completed only by Italian respondents. Results Responses were received by 69 healthcare professionals in Italy and 1064 worldwide. Overall, DDIs were widely recognized as clinically relevant in PC care. Digital tools (online databases and smartphone applications) were the most frequently used resources for DDI assessment in both cohorts, whereas AI-based tools were limited. Italian oncologists reported limited on-site pharmacologist access (29%), while global respondents reported more frequent pharmacologist support (76%). Common barriers included time constraints, uncertain reliability of sources, and lack of training. When DDI checkers conflicted, Italian and global respondents favored pharmacologist consultation, although global users relied also on literature (31%) and clinical judgment (26%). Proposed solutions differed between cohorts: Italian clinicians emphasized the need for greater access to pharmacologists’ support, whereas the global cohort highlighted institutional training and educational initiatives. Clinical scenarios demonstrated awareness of specific DDI risks, with cautious selection of ARTAs and co-medications in line with current recommendations. Conclusion Although limited by potential selection bias and restricted generalizability, these findings suggest that strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration could enhance patient safety and optimize therapy outcomes.

The Oncologist
University of Parma (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia (IT), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Fondazione Ricerca Molinette (IT), Oncotherapeutics (United States) (US), University Hospitals Parma Medical Center (US), Ospedale Sandro Pertini (IT), Ca' Foncello Hospital (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Portsmouth (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.