Research on the biomarkers in BI-RADS risk stratification to assist in the diagnosis of breast cancer

We investigated the efficacy of a diagnostic model that combines circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood, serum tumor markers, and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) based on Breast Ultrasound (US) in differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules, to provide evidence to improve discrimination between benign and malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules. In this prospective cohort study conducted at Beijing Tongren Hospital (March 2022–May 2024), 116 patients with BI-RADS 4 breast nodules were enrolled. Pathological diagnoses were available for 104 patients (69 malignant and 35 benign), whereas 12 patients remained under follow-up without pathological confirmation. Three samples (1 malignant, 1 benign, and 1 without pathological confirmation) failed sequencing quality control; therefore, the final model included 102 patients with both qualified sequencing and pathological data (68 malignant and 34 benign). Binary logistic regression combined SMC, CA15-3, and BI-RADS classification. Discrimination, calibration, decision curves, and pairwise DeLong tests were assessed. While BI-RADS 4a, 4b, and 4c subcategories exhibited malignancy rates of 42.9%, 51.5%, and 80.7% ( P = 0.001). The malignant group demonstrated significantly higher median SMC (3.00 vs. 1.00, P < 0.001) and mean CA15-3 levels (2.21 vs. 0.76 kU/L, P = 0.039), with SMC positively correlating with Ki-67 expression ( P < 0.001). The combined model achieved superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.798 (95% CI: 0.703–0.892), sensitivity of 86.8%, and specificity of 70.6%. Its AUC exceeded that of BI-RADS alone (0.692; ΔAUC = 0.105, 95% CI: 0.021–0.189; P = 0.014). The diagnostic model that integrates SMC, CA15-3 levels, and BI-RADS could significantly improve the differentiation of benign from malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-026-05891-4
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Research on the biomarkers in BI-RADS risk stratification to assist in the diagnosis of breast cancer

Mengliu Zhu, Ruijie Zhou, Shuai Zhou, Chaosen Yue et al.
Discover Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Research on the biomarkers in BI-RADS risk stratification to assist in the diagnosis of breast cancer

Mengliu Zhu, Ruijie Zhou, Shuai Zhou, Chaosen Yue, Hongtao Ji, 夏春霞, Yun Cheng, Zi Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Jing Liang, Ran Cheng, Qian Yu, Shan Guan, Bing Zhang, Qiang Zhu, Yang Zhao
article en

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy of a diagnostic model that combines circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood, serum tumor markers, and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) based on Breast Ultrasound (US) in differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules, to provide evidence to improve discrimination between benign and malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules. In this prospective cohort study conducted at Beijing Tongren Hospital (March 2022–May 2024), 116 patients with BI-RADS 4 breast nodules were enrolled. Pathological diagnoses were available for 104 patients (69 malignant and 35 benign), whereas 12 patients remained under follow-up without pathological confirmation. Three samples (1 malignant, 1 benign, and 1 without pathological confirmation) failed sequencing quality control; therefore, the final model included 102 patients with both qualified sequencing and pathological data (68 malignant and 34 benign). Binary logistic regression combined SMC, CA15-3, and BI-RADS classification. Discrimination, calibration, decision curves, and pairwise DeLong tests were assessed. While BI-RADS 4a, 4b, and 4c subcategories exhibited malignancy rates of 42.9%, 51.5%, and 80.7% ( P = 0.001). The malignant group demonstrated significantly higher median SMC (3.00 vs. 1.00, P < 0.001) and mean CA15-3 levels (2.21 vs. 0.76 kU/L, P = 0.039), with SMC positively correlating with Ki-67 expression ( P < 0.001). The combined model achieved superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.798 (95% CI: 0.703–0.892), sensitivity of 86.8%, and specificity of 70.6%. Its AUC exceeded that of BI-RADS alone (0.692; ΔAUC = 0.105, 95% CI: 0.021–0.189; P = 0.014). The diagnostic model that integrates SMC, CA15-3 levels, and BI-RADS could significantly improve the differentiation of benign from malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast nodules.

Discover Oncology
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Beijing Emergency Medical Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.