Reducing seclusion and mechanical restraint: a systemic and decision-oriented framework for mental health services
Purpose This study aims to develop a systemic and decision-oriented model to understand the organisational factors influencing the use of restrictive measures, namely, seclusion and mechanical restraint (SMR), in psychiatric inpatient mental health services. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a modelling-based approach to identify and structure the organisational factors associated with the use of SMR in psychiatric inpatient mental health services. A qualitative coercion descriptive model (CD-Model) was constructed from literature reviews and surveys to identify influencing factors. These factors were then weighted through pairwise comparisons to develop a coercion quantitative model (CQ-Model) assessing hospitals’ capacity to minimise the use of SMR. Findings The CD-Model identified four hierarchical dimensions and 24 factors influencing coercion-related decision-making but lacked synthesis for decision makers. The CQ-Model addressed this by introducing 11 supervision indicators, derived through mathematical aggregation, providing a framework for organisational analysis. Research limitations/implications This study proposes a model-based approach that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to structure and prioritise organisational factors influencing restrictive practices. By integrating interdisciplinary expertise, the framework provides a structured and quantified representation of these factors, supporting organisational diagnosis and planning in mental health services. Practical implications The proposed framework offers a decision-support tool for organisational actors and decision makers in mental health services, linking influencing factors to specific organisational levels. The model can support institutional audits, supervision processes and quality-improvement initiatives aimed at reducing the use of SMR. Although based on data from France, the scalable structure of the framework may provide guidance for other healthcare systems. Originality/value This study introduces an original model-based approach that uniquely integrates both qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a systemic and structured analysis of coercive measures in mental healthcare, offering a scalable framework applicable across different organisational settings.
Authors
- Johanna Clerc
- Sébastien Saetta
- É. Fakra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3522-4584)
- Yvonne Quenum
- Cemre Günes Sengül (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-7175)
- Magali Coldefy
- Loïc Rohr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-6857)
- Xavier Boucher
Institutions
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Mines Saint-Étienne (FR)
- Institut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé (FR)
- Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR)
- Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth (FR)
- École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Saint-Étienne (FR)
- Laboratoire COBRA (FR)
- Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Mental Health Review Journal
- Published
- 2026-09-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-04-2025-0031
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00