Tape‐Stripped Proteomics: A Comparative Analysis of Different Sample Collection Approaches

ABSTRACT Tape‐stripping of the stratum corneum is a promising non‐invasive approach for proteomic analysis of skin lesions, but the effects of sampling design and disc pressure on proteome readout remain poorly defined. Here, we assessed how inclusion of surrounding normal‐looking skin and variation in adhesive disc pressure influence protein detection from small melanocytic lesions. D‐squame tape strips were collected from six participants, including three moles and one matched normal skin site per participant. For lesion 1 (L1), discs were applied using light finger pressure. For lesion 2 (L2), the mole area was marked on the disc and separated from the surrounding skin, which was analysed separately (L2S). For lesion 3 (L3), increased pressure was applied using the upper barrel tip of a marker before excising the lesion‐matched area. Samples were analysed by DIA‐MS with DIA‐NN processing. In total, 2882 protein groups were identified, including 1719 shared across all groups. L3 yielded the highest number of unique proteins (77) and significantly altered proteins versus normal skin (142), compared with L2 (54 unique; 52 altered), L1 (30 unique; 4 altered), L2S (16 unique; 3 altered), and normal skin (7 unique). These findings show that precise lesion‐matched disc trimming and increased application pressure substantially improve tape‐strip proteomic depth and lesion‐specific signal detection. Multivariate analysis and supervised classification further separated lesional samples—most clearly the pressure‐assisted L3—from other collection methods, supporting these observations, although the small cohort warrants cautious interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROTEOMICS
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.70177
Primary Topic
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Tape‐Stripped Proteomics: A Comparative Analysis of Different Sample Collection Approaches

Ali Azimi, Lauren Faul, Petrina Chand, Pablo Fernandez‐Penas
PROTEOMICS
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
article

Tape‐Stripped Proteomics: A Comparative Analysis of Different Sample Collection Approaches

Ali Azimi, Lauren Faul, Petrina Chand, Pablo Fernandez‐Penas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tape‐stripping of the stratum corneum is a promising non‐invasive approach for proteomic analysis of skin lesions, but the effects of sampling design and disc pressure on proteome readout remain poorly defined. Here, we assessed how inclusion of surrounding normal‐looking skin and variation in adhesive disc pressure influence protein detection from small melanocytic lesions. D‐squame tape strips were collected from six participants, including three moles and one matched normal skin site per participant. For lesion 1 (L1), discs were applied using light finger pressure. For lesion 2 (L2), the mole area was marked on the disc and separated from the surrounding skin, which was analysed separately (L2S). For lesion 3 (L3), increased pressure was applied using the upper barrel tip of a marker before excising the lesion‐matched area. Samples were analysed by DIA‐MS with DIA‐NN processing. In total, 2882 protein groups were identified, including 1719 shared across all groups. L3 yielded the highest number of unique proteins (77) and significantly altered proteins versus normal skin (142), compared with L2 (54 unique; 52 altered), L1 (30 unique; 4 altered), L2S (16 unique; 3 altered), and normal skin (7 unique). These findings show that precise lesion‐matched disc trimming and increased application pressure substantially improve tape‐strip proteomic depth and lesion‐specific signal detection. Multivariate analysis and supervised classification further separated lesional samples—most clearly the pressure‐assisted L3—from other collection methods, supporting these observations, although the small cohort warrants cautious interpretation.

PROTEOMICS
Westmead Hospital (AU), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tape‐Stripped Proteomics: A Comparative Analysis of Different Sample Collection Approaches — Ali Azimi, Lauren Faul, et al. · PROTEOMICS (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS