Pressures, politics, possibilities: how AI might transform the research ecosystem

Purpose This paper aims to examine how the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research might transform the wider research ecosystem. Three plausible scenarios are discussed with major implications for the future role of universities and publishers, individual skill requirements, career development, and power relations between Global North and Global South. Design/methodology/approach The paper focuses on the interplay of technology affordances, industry dynamics, practice shifts and strategic moves by powerful actors to explain variations of how and how much AI might transform the research ecosystem. Findings The paper argues that while AI has a “democratizing effect” in making research tasks less costly and more convenient for scholars worldwide, it simultaneously increases skill requirements, efficiency pressures and thresholds for what counts as valuable data and knowledge. Investments by powerful institutions and corporations, particularly in the USA, Western Europe and China, reinforce and exploit these dynamics, leading to three plausible future scenarios: a higher-pressure version of today’s system, augmented by AI and dominated by resource-rich universities; a more distributed system driven by co-specialized clients and providers of proprietary data and knowledge services; and a platform-based system of semi-automated knowledge production dominated by big tech firms. Originality/value While most studies focus on technicalities of AI use in research, this paper shifts focus to the wider research ecosystem and the role powerful actors might play in driving these changes. It also discusses how increasing AI adoption may promote a shift from individual authorship and peer-to-peer exchange to more demand-driven, AI-based knowledge production and dissemination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Perspectives on International Business
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-06-2026-0166
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Pressures, politics, possibilities: how AI might transform the research ecosystem

Stephan Manning
Critical Perspectives on International Business
Research Data Management Practices
article

Pressures, politics, possibilities: how AI might transform the research ecosystem

Stephan Manning
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research might transform the wider research ecosystem. Three plausible scenarios are discussed with major implications for the future role of universities and publishers, individual skill requirements, career development, and power relations between Global North and Global South. Design/methodology/approach The paper focuses on the interplay of technology affordances, industry dynamics, practice shifts and strategic moves by powerful actors to explain variations of how and how much AI might transform the research ecosystem. Findings The paper argues that while AI has a “democratizing effect” in making research tasks less costly and more convenient for scholars worldwide, it simultaneously increases skill requirements, efficiency pressures and thresholds for what counts as valuable data and knowledge. Investments by powerful institutions and corporations, particularly in the USA, Western Europe and China, reinforce and exploit these dynamics, leading to three plausible future scenarios: a higher-pressure version of today’s system, augmented by AI and dominated by resource-rich universities; a more distributed system driven by co-specialized clients and providers of proprietary data and knowledge services; and a platform-based system of semi-automated knowledge production dominated by big tech firms. Originality/value While most studies focus on technicalities of AI use in research, this paper shifts focus to the wider research ecosystem and the role powerful actors might play in driving these changes. It also discusses how increasing AI adoption may promote a shift from individual authorship and peer-to-peer exchange to more demand-driven, AI-based knowledge production and dissemination.

Critical Perspectives on International Business
University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pressures, politics, possibilities: how AI might transform the research ecosystem — Stephan Manning · Critical Perspectives on International Business (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS