Statin Initiation and Mortality After Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Importance Observational studies have suggested improved survival among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who start statin therapy after diagnosis, but such studies are vulnerable to time-related biases and informative censoring. Objective To estimate the association between statin initiation after CRC treatment and CRC-specific and all-cause mortality using target trial emulation. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2015. Eligible adults had newly diagnosed CRC and no statin prescriptions in the prior 6 months. Time zero was the date of first CRC treatment. A clone-censor weight approach with stabilized inverse probability of censoring weights emulated initiation within a 6-month grace period. Data were analyzed at 3-month intervals during 60 months of follow-up from August 22, 2023, to November 22, 2025. Exposures Initiation of any statin within 6 months after first CRC treatment vs no initiation during the same grace period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was CRC-specific mortality; the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Weighted pooled logistic regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), 60-month marginal survival probabilities, and risk differences. Sensitivity analyses deliberately introduced immortal time bias and prevalent user bias. The same design was applied in a cohort with ischemic heart disease as a positive control. Results Among 88 516 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [11.7] years; 56 424 [63.7%] male), 2071 initiated statins and 86 445 did not. Statin initiation was associated with modestly lower CRC-specific mortality compared with noninitiation (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]); all-cause mortality was also lower but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-1.00]). The 60-month absolute differences in CRC-specific and all-cause mortality were small (1.1 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, −0.1 to 2.3 pp] and 2.4 pp [95% CI, 1.0-3.8 pp], respectively). Conventional analyses yielded more protective estimates. In the positive-control cohort with ischemic heart disease, statin initiation was associated with lower all-cause but not cardiovascular disease–specific mortality. Conclusions and Relevance In this nationwide cohort study of adults treated for CRC, the survival benefit associated with statin initiation was modest and substantially attenuated compared with conventional observational estimates, suggesting that earlier protective associations may have reflected time-related biases and informative censoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.33680
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Statin Initiation and Mortality After Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Aesun Shin, Hyeongtaek Woo
JAMA Network Open
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Statin Initiation and Mortality After Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Aesun Shin, Hyeongtaek Woo
article en

Abstract

Importance Observational studies have suggested improved survival among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who start statin therapy after diagnosis, but such studies are vulnerable to time-related biases and informative censoring. Objective To estimate the association between statin initiation after CRC treatment and CRC-specific and all-cause mortality using target trial emulation. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2015. Eligible adults had newly diagnosed CRC and no statin prescriptions in the prior 6 months. Time zero was the date of first CRC treatment. A clone-censor weight approach with stabilized inverse probability of censoring weights emulated initiation within a 6-month grace period. Data were analyzed at 3-month intervals during 60 months of follow-up from August 22, 2023, to November 22, 2025. Exposures Initiation of any statin within 6 months after first CRC treatment vs no initiation during the same grace period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was CRC-specific mortality; the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Weighted pooled logistic regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), 60-month marginal survival probabilities, and risk differences. Sensitivity analyses deliberately introduced immortal time bias and prevalent user bias. The same design was applied in a cohort with ischemic heart disease as a positive control. Results Among 88 516 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [11.7] years; 56 424 [63.7%] male), 2071 initiated statins and 86 445 did not. Statin initiation was associated with modestly lower CRC-specific mortality compared with noninitiation (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]); all-cause mortality was also lower but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-1.00]). The 60-month absolute differences in CRC-specific and all-cause mortality were small (1.1 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, −0.1 to 2.3 pp] and 2.4 pp [95% CI, 1.0-3.8 pp], respectively). Conventional analyses yielded more protective estimates. In the positive-control cohort with ischemic heart disease, statin initiation was associated with lower all-cause but not cardiovascular disease–specific mortality. Conclusions and Relevance In this nationwide cohort study of adults treated for CRC, the survival benefit associated with statin initiation was modest and substantially attenuated compared with conventional observational estimates, suggesting that earlier protective associations may have reflected time-related biases and informative censoring.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(9)
Seoul National University (KR), Keimyung University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.