Comparative analysis of four compound stomachs development, fermentation dynamics, and microbiome structure in Hu sheep and its crossbred combinations

Objective:This study was conducted to investigate the differences in fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial composition across the four stomach compartments between Hu sheep and its crossbreds, aiming to provide key references for targeted modulation of gastrointestinal tract function and improvement of ruminant feed conversion efficiency via crossbreeding.Methods: Forty-eight approximately 3-month-old male lambs, assigned to three genetic groups (HH:♂Hu×♀Hu, n=16; DH:♂Poll Dorset×♀Hu, n=16; SH:♂Southdown×♀Hu, n=16), were raised under uniform nutritional and management conditions for 95 d.Feed intake was determined daily and body weight were measured every 20 d.At the end of the trial, six sheep per group close to the average weight were slaughtered.Samples of digesta and tissue from the four stomachs were collected.Fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial community structure were analyzed.Results: Compared with the HH group (acetate: 25.8, 21.8, and 6.36 mmol/kg; propionate: 6.8, 5.60, and 3.65 mmol/kg; butyrate: 3.66, 3.19, and 1.38 mmol/kg), the DH group exhibited significantly higher acetate concentrations (45.3, 33.7, and 12.9 mmol/kg), propionate (14.3, 11.1, and 5.94 mmol/kg), and butyrate (12.9, 6.69, and 4.52 mmol/kg) in the rumen, reticulum, and omasum, respectively, indicating enhanced fermentation capacity, a significantly thicker rumen mucosal epithelium suggesting a greater capacity for VFA absorption.Taxonomic analysis showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the predominant phyla in four stomachs.Differential analysis identified that the DH group had significantly enriched taxa associated with fiber degradation (e.g., Fibrobacterota, Spirochaetota) in the forestomachs.Conversely, the rumen of HH group was enriched with Anaerolineae, associated with complex plant fiber degradation.PICRUSt2 functional prediction indicated that differentially microbes in the DH group were primarily linked to the biosynthesis of lysine and arginine, whereas those in the HH group were enriched in degradation pathways such as amino acid degradation.Conclusion:The DH group markedly elevated VFA production by modulating the forestomach microbial structure.Combined with adaptive improvements in rumen epithelial, this effect potentially enhanced energy utilization and growth performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Bioscience
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.260416
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative analysis of four compound stomachs development, fermentation dynamics, and microbiome structure in Hu sheep and its crossbred combinations

Chun E. Niu, Zhi Geng, Hai Na Shi, Yao Yue et al.
Animal Bioscience
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Comparative analysis of four compound stomachs development, fermentation dynamics, and microbiome structure in Hu sheep and its crossbred combinations

Chun E. Niu, Zhi Geng, Hai Na Shi, Yao Yue, Qiao Li, Rui Zhang, Xue Jiao An, Jin Xia Zhang, Zhen Fei Xu
article en

Abstract

Objective:This study was conducted to investigate the differences in fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial composition across the four stomach compartments between Hu sheep and its crossbreds, aiming to provide key references for targeted modulation of gastrointestinal tract function and improvement of ruminant feed conversion efficiency via crossbreeding.Methods: Forty-eight approximately 3-month-old male lambs, assigned to three genetic groups (HH:♂Hu×♀Hu, n=16; DH:♂Poll Dorset×♀Hu, n=16; SH:♂Southdown×♀Hu, n=16), were raised under uniform nutritional and management conditions for 95 d.Feed intake was determined daily and body weight were measured every 20 d.At the end of the trial, six sheep per group close to the average weight were slaughtered.Samples of digesta and tissue from the four stomachs were collected.Fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial community structure were analyzed.Results: Compared with the HH group (acetate: 25.8, 21.8, and 6.36 mmol/kg; propionate: 6.8, 5.60, and 3.65 mmol/kg; butyrate: 3.66, 3.19, and 1.38 mmol/kg), the DH group exhibited significantly higher acetate concentrations (45.3, 33.7, and 12.9 mmol/kg), propionate (14.3, 11.1, and 5.94 mmol/kg), and butyrate (12.9, 6.69, and 4.52 mmol/kg) in the rumen, reticulum, and omasum, respectively, indicating enhanced fermentation capacity, a significantly thicker rumen mucosal epithelium suggesting a greater capacity for VFA absorption.Taxonomic analysis showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the predominant phyla in four stomachs.Differential analysis identified that the DH group had significantly enriched taxa associated with fiber degradation (e.g., Fibrobacterota, Spirochaetota) in the forestomachs.Conversely, the rumen of HH group was enriched with Anaerolineae, associated with complex plant fiber degradation.PICRUSt2 functional prediction indicated that differentially microbes in the DH group were primarily linked to the biosynthesis of lysine and arginine, whereas those in the HH group were enriched in degradation pathways such as amino acid degradation.Conclusion:The DH group markedly elevated VFA production by modulating the forestomach microbial structure.Combined with adaptive improvements in rumen epithelial, this effect potentially enhanced energy utilization and growth performance.

Animal Bioscience
Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences (CN), Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.