Barriers and enablers of scaled agile multidisciplinary product development

Purpose Scaling Agile approaches in multidisciplinary physical product development faces unique challenges. This review identifies and synthesizes barriers and enablers that are used to understand tensions and propose initial recommendations. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-method literature review combining narrative review and thematic analysis was conducted. Systematic screening of 3,427 texts yielded 30 studies (2014–2025). Using the Gioia method, barriers and enablers were coded into first-level concepts, grouped into second-level themes and aggregated into high-level dimensions, enabling synthesis across industries and contexts. Findings Key barriers include cultural resistance, complex stakeholder dynamics and product physicality. Enablers include cross-functional collaboration, management buy-in and flat structures. Six key strategic areas are proposed to guide adoption. Originality/value The intersection of Agile, physical product development, multi-disciplinarity and scalability, through the lens of socio-technical systems theory, represents an original investigative angle. This is used to identify patterns and tensions and to propose six key strategic areas to guide coordinated Agile transformation, contributing to both academic discourse and practitioner guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-12-2025-1250
Primary Topic
Product Development and Customization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Barriers and enablers of scaled agile multidisciplinary product development

Alessandro Pisanu
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Product Development and Customization
article

Barriers and enablers of scaled agile multidisciplinary product development

Alessandro Pisanu
article en

Abstract

Purpose Scaling Agile approaches in multidisciplinary physical product development faces unique challenges. This review identifies and synthesizes barriers and enablers that are used to understand tensions and propose initial recommendations. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-method literature review combining narrative review and thematic analysis was conducted. Systematic screening of 3,427 texts yielded 30 studies (2014–2025). Using the Gioia method, barriers and enablers were coded into first-level concepts, grouped into second-level themes and aggregated into high-level dimensions, enabling synthesis across industries and contexts. Findings Key barriers include cultural resistance, complex stakeholder dynamics and product physicality. Enablers include cross-functional collaboration, management buy-in and flat structures. Six key strategic areas are proposed to guide adoption. Originality/value The intersection of Agile, physical product development, multi-disciplinarity and scalability, through the lens of socio-technical systems theory, represents an original investigative angle. This is used to identify patterns and tensions and to propose six key strategic areas to guide coordinated Agile transformation, contributing to both academic discourse and practitioner guidance.

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Product Development and Customization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Barriers and enablers of scaled agile multidisciplinary product development — Alessandro Pisanu · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS