Comprehensive performance evaluation of spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods across diverse computational scenarios

Spatial transcriptome technology enables researchers to spatially reconstruct transcription patterns based on location information. However, due to the limitation of low resolution, gene expression data from spatial spots may be a mixture results from multiple cells. To uncover the cell type composition within each spot, many researcher groups have developed spatial transcriptome deconvolution methods. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of 19 existing methods, evaluating them with respect to accuracy, robustness and usability. We compared these methods under varying conditions, including different numbers of genes, spots, and cell subtypes. Our findings indicate that MACD, DestVI, and RCTD are the top methods for performing cellular deconvolution overall. We also summarized the experimental results and provided guidelines to assist researchers in quickly selecting the most suitable method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocomputing
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.135120
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comprehensive performance evaluation of spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods across diverse computational scenarios

Liang Yu, Chenguang Zhao, Yan Li, Zilin Li
Neurocomputing
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Comprehensive performance evaluation of spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods across diverse computational scenarios

Liang Yu, Chenguang Zhao, Yan Li, Zilin Li
article en

Abstract

Spatial transcriptome technology enables researchers to spatially reconstruct transcription patterns based on location information. However, due to the limitation of low resolution, gene expression data from spatial spots may be a mixture results from multiple cells. To uncover the cell type composition within each spot, many researcher groups have developed spatial transcriptome deconvolution methods. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of 19 existing methods, evaluating them with respect to accuracy, robustness and usability. We compared these methods under varying conditions, including different numbers of genes, spots, and cell subtypes. Our findings indicate that MACD, DestVI, and RCTD are the top methods for performing cellular deconvolution overall. We also summarized the experimental results and provided guidelines to assist researchers in quickly selecting the most suitable method.

NeurocomputingVol. 707
Xidian University (CN), Xi'an Polytechnic University (CN), Xijing Hospital (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National University's Basic Research Foundation of China, Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comprehensive performance evaluation of spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods across diverse computational scenarios — Liang Yu, Chenguang Zhao, et al. · Neurocomputing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS