Leading language change: precept versus practice of strong verbs in Early Modern Dutch

Abstract The start of the standardization of Dutch in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, with its codification in spelling guides, grammars and dictionaries, has been extensively studied. Less well-studied, however, is whether and how these early normative works affected language use at the time. This study explores this question in a case study focussing on strong verbs from the third ablaut class in 17th-century Dutch. Analysing both a corpus of normative grammars – precept – from the time period, as well as usage data – practice – from a Dutch 17th-century newspaper corpus and previously existing data from literary works, private letters and a Bible translation, it shows there are important differences between the two different verb types that fall under ablaut class III, which can be attributed to the differences in timing of their changes as well as the class size and token frequencies of the verbs that fall under the two types. Overall, however, normative influence is shown to be unlikely for this language phenomenon: the norms were lagging behind, rather than leading language change. Rather, the results indicate that the genre of newspapers may have been leading this change by example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2025-0025
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leading language change: precept versus practice of strong verbs in Early Modern Dutch

Isabeau De Smet, Machteld de Vos
Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Leading language change: precept versus practice of strong verbs in Early Modern Dutch

Isabeau De Smet, Machteld de Vos
article en

Abstract

Abstract The start of the standardization of Dutch in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, with its codification in spelling guides, grammars and dictionaries, has been extensively studied. Less well-studied, however, is whether and how these early normative works affected language use at the time. This study explores this question in a case study focussing on strong verbs from the third ablaut class in 17th-century Dutch. Analysing both a corpus of normative grammars – precept – from the time period, as well as usage data – practice – from a Dutch 17th-century newspaper corpus and previously existing data from literary works, private letters and a Bible translation, it shows there are important differences between the two different verb types that fall under ablaut class III, which can be attributed to the differences in timing of their changes as well as the class size and token frequencies of the verbs that fall under the two types. Overall, however, normative influence is shown to be unlikely for this language phenomenon: the norms were lagging behind, rather than leading language change. Rather, the results indicate that the genre of newspapers may have been leading this change by example.

Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.